Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

A few extracts from the book

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Now, it so happens that I profoundly disagree with Mr. Jaswant Singh’s assessment of Jinnah. Ever since I read the multi-volume Jinnah Papers — brought out by the National Archives of Pakistan; the two-volume, Foundations of Pakistan, edited by Syed Sharifuddin Pirzada; and the four-volume History of Partition of India, edited by the Pakistani historian, K.K. Aziz, Jinnah has seemed to me a pinched, narrow-minded, diabolic schemer — one who used and was used by the British to divide India. To use his words, he ‘forged a pistol’, the armed thugs shoring up the Muslim League. He unleashed them in his ‘Direct Action’ against Hindus. He paralysed the Interim Government through Liaquat Ali. From 1937 onwards, he worked stealthily and continuously with the British to thwart every scheme that might have preserved a united India. His contemptuous characterisations of India, of Hindus, of our national movement and its leaders, make one’s blood boil to this day. That he talked Islam and drank whiskey, ate ham, and the rest, that he hardly knew the Quran to say nothing of living by it, do not prove his secularism to me, they make him out to be a hypocrite. In a word, far from being ‘attracted’ by Jinnah, as my senior Jaswant Singh is, I am repelled by him.

    And book after book that I have read regarding those decades since I wrote about him and his stratagems twenty-five years ago has etched that image even deeper. My perspective also differs for another reason from the one that informs Jaswant Singh’s book, and that, if I may add, of those who still dream of a ‘grand confederation of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh’, of those who still talk of Akhand Bharat. Having waded through the writings of Islamic leaders and clerics of the period, and seeing the direction in which Pakistan and Bangladesh have evolved — have inevitably evolved, given the principles on which they were founded, principles that Jinnah articulated and insisted upon incessantly — I have come to realise that Girilal Jain was the one who was right. You are dead wrong, he told me, after reading what I had written about Jinnah. The best thing that has happened for us is the Partition. It has given us breathing time, a little time to resurrect and save our pluralist culture and religions. Had it not happened, we would have been bullied and thrashed and swamped by Islamic fundamentalists. So, my lament is the opposite of Jaswant Singh’s today. And it also so happens that I am an adorer of Sardar Patel as of the Lokmanya, and a worshipper of Gandhiji.

    ... contd.

    Next1234
    Well written comment but....By: Naveen | 17-Sep-2009 Reply | Forward I like the general tenor, clarity and well balanced reaction in your comment but I totally disagreed with the epithet heaped on Advani.He may be old but not tired man.while using this language against him you should not have forgotten the long untiring and selfless service and his untainted public life.Shourie ji may be having a difference of opinion with him but I do not have any doubt that he must be having a great respect for him personally.
    Jaswant and ShourieBy: Sanjiv | 15-Sep-2009 Reply | Forward Are we heading for simillar situation today??? Tired, old leaders are eager to leave their mark on history by arriving at peace with Pakistan at any cost,but the rogue state is constantly upping its ante under the indifferent and self centeric attitude of indifferent Americans and unleashes thousand "Direct Actions" to bleed India with Thousand cuts. History repeats twice - first as a tragedy ....second time as a far bigger tragedy.
    Shouries CommentsBy: Albert | 28-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward One may ask Mr Shourie if the Tragedy in Punjab in 1984, the Abduction and killing of thousands of young men and women on the suspicion of their being Naxalites by the state authorities all over India in the 70ies, the training and arming of LTTE in India, were acts of muslim fundamentalists or followers of Gandhiji or members of a religous group, which adores peace? Is the basic teaching of non-violence being respected by all followers of Hinduis?. Look at what was done to Africans and Incas, Mayas and Aztecs in the name of Christ. Were the destroyers of Africa and LatinoAmerica Muslims? The situation on the subcontinent has been and is very complicated as to be explained with the help of theories of fundamentalisms and Holy Persons and Demons. Those who control the subcontinent today are nervous, since they fear, they will lose the control one day. The attemps to divide today are equally well meant to keep the things under control by minorities, who follow their own interests.
    Shourie on Ban on the bookBy: (Prof) Pravin Sheth | 27-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward A brilliant piece by a scholar-journalist.The incisive analysis by Shourie should immediately persuade--rather prompt Modi Govt. to retrace its highly faulty step and lift the ban on Jashvantsingh's book.Let the CM concentrates on his dynamic development drive to build Gujarat as a fast forward state oriented to inclusive development.Prof.Pravin Sheth,Dayton-OH,USA)
    Jaswant Singh's new book on JinnahBy: K B Kale | 26-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward I don't want a single naya paisa of my hard-earned money to go into Mr Jaswant Singh's (deep) pockets. So I have to wait till the pirated edition of this book appears.Then only I will read it and comment.I have only done it once before, when I bought the book "In the line of fire" by Musharraf.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.