Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

A freshness in the Levant

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • The point of departure is in the face-off between Obama and Netanyahu’s intransigent, Right-dominated government, as evidenced in Netanyahu’s Washington visit and thereafter. A hard enough push by Obama on halting all settlement activity, on the lines of the 2003 “roadmap to peace”, would unseat Netanyahu. But Israeli commentators say that Netanyahu brought this upon himself by giving conservatives in his cabinet the latitude he has — epitomised by Avigdor Lieberman and Justice Minister Yaakov Neeman proposing allegedly racist legislations such as the “Nakba law” and the “oath of loyalty.”

    Netanyahu’s hands are full, within and without. The most he can offer right now is the removal of “outposts” deemed illegal even by Israeli law, but he can’t stop “natural growth” in existing settlements as sanctioned by the Bush administration. If he halts settlement activity altogether, it’s curtains for his government. Yet, he must offer Obama something. But his compromise has no takers in Washington.

    Ads by Google

    A hard line by Israeli governments has usually paid off in the past. There are also justifiable doubts about how far Obama can really change West Asia’s modus operandi. But he has come to the problem early in his presidency, with a set of Dos and Don’ts. The fundamental disagreement is supposedly Obama’s stated goal of two states and Netanyahu’s resistance to it. True, if Tzipi Livni were prime minister, this friction might have been avoided, given Livni’s commitment to the two-state solution. Yet, on May 24, Netanyahu told his cabinet about making “some reservations about a Palestinian state in a final status agreement” — his first use of the term “Palestinian state” as PM, though he hasn’t approved of the idea. The disagreement is really a question of prioritisation. Netanyahu’s one-point agenda is the Iranian nuclear treat, convinced as he is that the crisis will come on his watch. He wants Iran to end its nuclear programme as a condition for talks with Palestinians. This is the inverse of Obama’s logic that re-starting the peace process will make it easier to pressure Iran.

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext123
    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.