The construction of an interim government attempted to ensure “broad representation of all segments of the Afghan population” which included the mujahideen. Exiled Afghans convening at Bonn agreed upon Hamid Karzai’s appointment as president. The Loya Jirga would within six months decide upon the make-up of the transitional government and free and fair elections would be held no later two years after the Bonn Agreement. In spirit the agreement attempted to unite the country; in reality it re-instated those who were responsible for the Afghan civil war. Key ministerial posts were given to warlords. For instance, Abdul Rashid Dostum, who runs one of the most powerful private militaries in the world, was appointed special adviser on security and military affairs. So, it appeared that the new democratic administration supervised by international authorities consisted of thugs who had legitimised their authority. This organisation superficially represented the different ethnic communities within Afghanistan, but what it failed to take into account was that the warlords could in turn run provinces as their own fiefdoms. However, there was no alternative to the Bonn Agreement — until much later.

This form of government encouraged corruption but most of all it undermined the authority of Karzai. Karzai had been promised aid and assistance in developing Afghanistan, and on several accounts both prior to the deterioration of the situation and post he mentioned the need for international assistance. The US had pledged support however, as the re-building of Afghanistan was taking place, the US engaged itself in Iraq — committing money and resources — $300 billion of its finances to topple the regime of Saddam Hussein and liberate the Iraqis. The UN too had pledged financial assistance and ground assistance, which materialised in the NATO force, ISAF. ISAF was given the responsibility of securing Kabul and the immediate surrounding areas, but the enemy lay outside Kabul, towards the Afghan-Pakistan border with FATA. The US, it appeared, had banked on European and Pakistani support to partially cover the costs of the Afghan problem — the EU under-contributed and the Pakistani’s under the leadership of Musharraf abused finances and authority.

... contd.