A visit to Pakistan this week by Hillary Clinton, America’s secretary of state, was greeted in the grimmest possible fashion. A suicide-bomber exploded a car packed with explosives and killed over 100 people in a crowded bazaar in Peshawar, in North-West Frontier Province. The presumed culprits, the Taliban, have also reached the capital, Islamabad. On October 22nd an army brigadier was ambushed outside his house and killed by two gunmen on a motorcycle. In two bloody weeks more than 250 people have died in suicide-attacks in Peshawar, Islamabad and Lahore. Security agencies are warning of more murder to come.

Mrs Clinton visited Pakistan for several important reasons. She wanted to assure Pakistanis that America is no longer just a fair-weather friend. Rather, it is here to stay and support Pakistan in its fight against terrorism and poverty. A bill signed by President Barack Obama on October 12th grants Pakistan $7.5 billion in assistance for development and to alleviate poverty in the next five years.

However, that act of apparent generosity was spurned by most Pakistanis as “insulting and intrusive” because of conditions attached to it, which implied that Pakistan’s army and security agencies were complicit in harbouring terrorists and undermining the civilian government of President Asif Zardari. Egged on by the army, the Pakistani press, its mindset forged by years of state-sponsored jihad against the infidels—the Soviet Union in Afghanistan in the 1980s and India in the 1990s—has assailed the legislation as “dishonouring” Pakistan and serving only American interests. Indeed, until very recently, the predominant view was that the war against the Taliban was America’s fight, not Pakistan’s. Against this backdrop, Mrs Clinton came to Pakistan not just to pledge support in counter-terrorism but to prop up its fledgling democracy.

... contd.