Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

A long winter in Swat

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • The Swat valley’s steady descent into chaos, from a bustling leisure tourism destination up until the ’90s to a cultural wasteland now controlled by a bunch of medieval-minded Taliban, tells a sorry tale of state complacence, as it continues to fail. Monday’s agreement signed between the government and the local Taliban in Swat will change little for the wronged people of the valley; it only puts a stamp of approval over the sealing of their fate. The mullahs have won this battle as the government buckles under pressure.

    Eleven months into office, this government presided over by Asif Ali Zardari has built a dubious record of saying one thing and doing the other. Examples abound, in domestic and foreign affairs. But let’s stick to the latest bungling: two days before the government agreed to a ceasefire deal with the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan in Swat, Zardari had assured the nation that fighting off the Taliban was the only way forward.

    Ads by Google

    The deal struck in the valley is dangerous in its implications. It has virtually made the entire area over to the Taliban, where their hitherto illegal writ in the garb of Islamic Sharia laws is now being accepted as a fait accompli. Under the deal, those forced to seek justice from Sharia courts will now have no right of appeal in a higher civil court. How could you have two parallel justice systems running in the same country? And knowing justice, Taliban style, leaves one with cold feet. The intolerant and brutal tribal warlords know no mercy, and have no regard for human life and dignity. Summary executions of men and women who do not subscribe to their brand of Islam are the only justice they practise.

    The father-in-law-son-in-law duo of Sufi Mohammad and Fazlullah have acted like bandits for years now, terrorising the traditionally peace-loving and docile Swatis. Taliban vigilantes under their command have been blowing up public infrastructure, including the Swat airport, power houses and several tourist resorts. They have been beheading their opponents in public execution stunts, destroying girls’ schools and colleges, killing barbers who dare to offer a shaving service to men; enforcing a dress code, systematically brutalising women who step out of the house and burning down music shops have been their preoccupation. Is this the vision the government has for a progressive Pakistan, free of terrorism?

    The people of Swat deserve better, not least because in last year’s election they had voted for the same secular parties, the People’s Party and the Awami National Party (PPP and ANP), which have now buckled under pressure and bargained their electorates’ basic rights away. It is some measure of their medieval mindset that after declaring war on the state, the Taliban had forced vehicles entering the Swat valley to drive on the right hand (wrong) side of the road because driving on the left was supposedly un-Islamic. So are women’s education and men without beards.

    Swat was the country’s favourite tourist destination dotted with pre-Islamic national heritage sites until the two clerics started flexing their muscles. This is not the first time the government has struck a so-called peace deal with them. The Benazir Bhutto government back in 1994 had also reached a similar agreement whereby Sharia laws were promulgated in the region. Then, in 1999, the Sharif government had offered more if the mullahs refrained from recruiting young men for jihad in Afghanistan. The Musharraf regime, too, soft-peddled the issue, allowing an illegal anti-state propaganda FM radio station to continue, but there was no end to the demands made by the clerics and their vigilante goons who went around enforcing Sharia at gunpoint. Since 2007, there has been utter lawlessness in the valley; the army was reluctantly forced to launch a clean-up operation after the local police ran for their lives.

    If the past is any guide, it’s only a matter of time as to when the current agreement will collapse. But more important, the signing of the ceasefire deal from a position of weakness on the part of the government has sent out a very wrong signal. It is an unequivocal failure, due largely to the lack of will in Islamabad to contain militarism inside Pakistan and its spill-over elsewhere. Now that the Taliban have pressured the Frontier’s provincial government and Islamabad into acquiescence in one part of the country, what is to stop them from replicating their designs elsewhere?

    The ANP-led Frontier government has been totally inept in dealing with the emerging threat, one whose very target is the ANP itself. It has been very sheepish and rather embarrassed about the ongoing military operations in parts of the adjacent Federally Administered Tribal Areas (Fata), which are the hotbed of Islamist terrorism that eyes the whole wide world, far beyond Pakistan’s own borders.

    The ceasefire, even if it holds for a while, will give way to more acts of lawlessness as defined by the constitution of Pakistan. As the Taliban go about enforcing Sharia, there is bound to be untold misery caused to the hapless people at its receiving end. All kinds of rights abuses will be instituted as part of keeping order; women will be among the most disadvantaged. And what’s to stop the Taliban from regrouping as the ceasefire lasts, and expanding their writ to the neighbouring districts?

    These are troubling signs of the government’s capitulation before a public enemy against whom it has failed to protect its citizens. The Taliban and the like need to be weeded out; there cannot be any rules of engagement with such rogue elements. No responsible state can barter away its citizens’ rights to a group of bandits who only believe in violence as their tool of operation. The Taliban can lay no claim to being in the mainstream of politics because it is not the ballot but the bullet on which their power rests. The state is acting against its own citizens by according such elements any recognition by signing the so-called peace deal with them, and that too without passing it through parliament.

    The writer is an editor with ‘Dawn’, Karachi

    express@expressindia.com

    Swat By: omar | 18-Feb-2009 Reply | Forward sharia law was the rule of the land (swat) up until 1969. and it was the most peaceful place in the subcontinent. It was again enforced during 1990's due to the demand of the people of swat. and now again it is the demand of the people. Its a different story if you consider all people of pakistan a bunch of medieval-minded Taliban.
    ShariaBy: Appu | 19-Feb-2009 Reply | Forward If sharia makes swat a peaceful place. at omar claimed, may be India should export all those sharia loving people to Swat. May peace be upon them.
    Ruling with TalebanBy: Father Tony Gritts | 18-Feb-2009 Reply | Forward What else should you expect from a failed and terrorist state. The world should bomb this country to smitherines.
    ImplosionBy: Syed Amir | 18-Feb-2009 Reply | Forward Indians wished hard for Pakistans demise, you rwish is coming true, and soon once Pakistan implodes, there will be millions rushing to the Indian borders and a complete mayhem will ensue.Thats why they say, dont wish too hard for what you want, you may get it, seems India is going to get it.
    u seem 2 b sick By: Dev Kumar | 18-Feb-2009 Reply | Forward r u demonstrating some kind of a superior strategic thinking? That's been an ageold muslim problem, isn't it? You seem to know the past, present and future better than everyone else.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.