You are here: IE »   Story

A mother’s touch

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Discount UK Shopping

    No matter how the BJP handles it, there’s no denying that their election campaign’s been put on steroids by a couple of Gandhis gone rogue. Varun Gandhi’s Muslim-hating demagoguery is being quietly backed up by his mother, who alleged that 45 of Varun’s supporters were beaten up by the police and that a Muslim police officer, Pervez Mian, personally injured 25 BJP workers. This was strongly denied by the Pilibhit police chief, who said that the officer had in fact been transferred out of town precisely to avoid such controversy.

    The dispossessed cousin crossing over to the dark side is a familiar epic trope for many Indians — Maneka and Varun moved to the BJP in 2004, a major miscalculation in an election that installed the Congress-led UPA in power. Varun Gandhi had been consistently sidelined in the BJP for the fact that he didn’t come up the party ranks, and was finally gifted his mother’s old constituency of Pilibhit. Now, his hate-mongering has bought him publicity that money couldn’t buy. He knows that he fits into a tradition of politician provocateurs who expertly play the media and inflame social tensions; and emerge out of it with national name-recall, their political presence hugely enhanced. Over Varun Gandhi, the BJP has chosen a too clever by half strategy — disassociating from the combustible content of Varun’s speech, questioning the CD’s veracity, and yet also failing to rein in the parts of its cadre that ran amok in Pilibhit. With various party members taking different tacks, the BJP hopes to energise its hardcore Hindu base, while placating queasy allies like the JD(U) with official disclaimers.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Communal Fanatics Bring Disgrace to the motherlandBy: Seema Zafar | 31-Mar-2009 Reply | Forward If you have no respect for Indian Constitution and Indian Citizens then you deserve the same treatment that Varun is getting. Learn to respect your country and it's honorable citizens. Neither Varun nor Maneka are poor. I have no sympathies for individuals who spread hate. Jesa Karam Karo gay, Vesa Fal milay ga.!
    poor Varun GandhiBy: Mannoj | 30-Mar-2009 Reply | Forward Why each media house has to prove it's secular credetial by bashing poor mother-son. Who has been betryed by cunning foreigner. Without proving anything how can media convict someone... like this.. it happens only in india. Do somewhere else and show will over for ever. Specially one channel using "Varun zaherille Gandhi" who are they......to give don't anyone see hate speech in that? why using an name is considered communal just because it's muslim name ... what if it was some sukhiram? no problem is it ? If india becomes 100 parts it will be partial media who is responsible for it.
    Poor VarunBy: Abhay | 30-Mar-2009 Reply | Forward If Varun has said all that is attributed to him, Govt of the day can punish him but for the fact that they will have to prove it. Hence no one is paying attention to it, otherwise how difficult was it for the govt agencies to find the original CD's and get it verified for its authenticity.
    dual rulesBy: rajesh | 30-Mar-2009 Reply | Forward gaurav,dont take these english media seriously,they are sold out against hindus becuase the money cmesf rom hindu haters abroad like sauadi arabia and evangelicals.THese are shameless peons who are the enmies within like jaichand in history.Even dawood isbetter he fled to pakistan and is more honest than these disgusting english media with hindu names and their double standards that u pointed out.THis duplicity against hindus has been going on for 20 yrs with islamic,christian congress muscle and money.So these dogs need the bones and crumbs to bark at hindus and bjp.The way modi was vilified even if he is develloping gujarat can only be done by inda's enemies.See how gupta and chisti admit guilt by censoring this.Free speec only for mfhusain and shahi imam who said we will repet 1947 which was worse than anything varun said.
    proprietyBy: gaurav | 30-Mar-2009 Reply | Forward As i understand, she had only mentioned the police officer who allegedly fired at some of the demonstrators, if he just happens to be a muslim, why are you giving a communal tone to it?if the officer mentioned would have been a christian or sikh, would you have taken pains of writing an edit?
    A lie?By: Anshuman Patel | 30-Mar-2009 Reply | Forward It's not the question of Muslim or otherwise. She lied..perhaps deliberately. This insinuation is the issue here and not the religion. Why she lied? Why some are hell bent on defending everything mouthed by this mother-son duo who were persona non grata just a few years ago? What's the compulsion?
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.