Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

A positive Hindu-Vatican dialogue

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Personal Loan
    Stupendous two days. I’ll never forget these two days lived in love and trust and engaged in Hindu-Christian dialogue.” This is how Jean-Louis Pierre Tauran, president of the Pope’s Council for Inter-Faith Dialogue, Vatican City, described the interaction between Hindu and Christian representatives in Mumbai on Friday and Saturday. Coming from someone who experienced the depth and breadth of the spiritual tradition in India for the first time, this effusive response seemed natural. Hindu participants too were unanimous that this was a fruitful dialogue.

    There have been several useful dialogues in the past between Hindu religious leaders and representatives of the Catholic Church. By and large, the themes of these dialogues were “academic” in nature, as they sought to explore the theological common ground between the two faiths. But the Mumbai meet was different for three significant reasons. First, this was the first formal interaction between the two sides after the unfortunate flare-up of conflict in Orissa last year, which highlighted two inter-related facts: the condemnable violent attack on churches and innocent Christians on the one hand and, on the other, the rising Hindu disquiet over a sustained campaign of conversion to Christianity. Second, this was for the first time that the Catholic delegation was led by the Pope’s highest emissary heading the department of inter-faith dialogue. Third, this was also for the first time that Hindu religious leaders of high eminence participated in the dialogue, sending a clear message that the Hindu side is ready to engage in a constructive dialogue with Christians of all denominations.

    Ads by Google

    Swami Jayendra Saraswati, the Shankaracharya of Kanchi Mutt, led the Hindu delegation, which included Sri Sri Ravi Shankar, founder of the Art of Living movement; Swami Chidananda Saraswati of Parmarth Niketan, Rishikesh; Rajayogini Dadi Janki of Brahmakumaris; Swami Nikhileshwaranandaji and Swami Vigishanandji, two senior monks from Ramakrishna Mission; Sri Venkatachariar Chaturvedi Swami of Sri Ramanuja Mission Trust and Mahamandaleshwar Swami Vishveshwaranand Giri Maharaj of Sanyas Ashram, Hardwar. Catholic participants included Pedro Lopez Quintana, the Vatican’s ambassador in India; Archbishop Felix Machado of Nashik; Bishop Thomas Dabre of Pune and Bishop Raphy Manjaly of Varanasi.

    I was surprised to be invited to participate in the event, which was hosted by the Archbishop of Mumbai, Cardinal Oswald Gracias, a genuine bridge-builder between the two communities. My only qualification, perhaps, was that I had participated in a global inter-faith meet on religious conversion in Italy in 2006, which was jointly organised by the Vatican and its Protestant counterpart, the Geneva-based World Council of Churches. It was the first ever inter-faith dialogue, organised by the two large Christian establishments, focused exclusively on the thorny issue of religious conversion. The joint statement adopted at the end of that meet has become a landmark document. Even the BJP’s manifesto for the recent parliamentary elections carried an appreciative endorsement of it, and called for the “setting up of a permanent inter-faith consultative mechanism to promote harmony and trust between communities”.

    The good part of the Mumbai meet was that, even though the issue of conversion dominated it, the deliberations were marked by candour as well as cordiality. The Hindu leaders unequivocally condemned anti-Christian violence. Catholic participants were equally unequivocal in affirming that forced conversion, and conversion with allurements of any kind, is invalid and rejected. They stated that all faiths were worthy of equal respect. This is an affirmation that Hindu leaders have been waiting to hear for a long time, since many Christian and Muslim scholars make a thoroughly untenable distinction between “People of the Book” (Jews, Christians and Muslims) and those outside the “Book”. The long history of religious conversion in India has shown how Hinduism was, and still is in many places, presented as a “pagan” and “false” religion, whose adherents could attain salvation only by abandoning “falsehood” and embracing the sole “True Path”.

    Cardinal Tauran, a godly man of deep reflection, has imparted a refreshing new perspective on the Vatican’s relations with Hinduism and other oriental faiths. In an interview last year, he had categorically stated that “he would be travelling to India soon and there he wanted to give this message that all religions are equal...We mustn’t get the impression there are first-class religions and second-class religions.” His remarks in Mumbai have created a sound basis for carrying forward the Hindu-Christian dialogue in a positive direction. The genuineness of the interaction was also evident from the fact that, after the first day’s closed-door deliberations, Cardinal Tauran led the Christian delegation on a goodwill visit to Mumbai’s famous Siddhivinayak Temple. This was followed by the Hindu delegation visiting the Holy Name Catholic Cathedral.

    The scope of inter-faith dialogue got enlarged on the second day when Cardinal Tauran was the chief guest at a soulful all-religion prayer, followed by an enlightening colloquium, in which eminent Muslim, Jewish, Zoroastrian, Sikh, Jain and Buddhist personalities also participated. It was organised by Shantilal Somaiya, a renowned octogenarian educationist, who has been striving for better inter-religious understanding for many decades.

    The road of reconciliation and durable harmony and peace is a hard one. Several important questions need greater debate leading to convergent positions. In the months ahead, both Hindu and Christian leaders also have a duty to crystallise mutual trust and understanding into a practical and collaborative agenda of action at all levels, including the grassroots level, to remove the sources of prejudices, tension and conflict. How to move ahead? One clue was given by Swami Chidananda Saraswati, who said, “Apni apni bhakti, parantu sabse badhkar rashtra bhakti.” (Let us love and follow our respective faiths, but keep love of the nation above all.)

    sudheenkulkarni@gmail.com

    Missionaries are never trust worthy.By: Nagaraj | 21-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward It is to be noted that these vatican people are very cunning. They are observing that the Hundus are awakening and they want to slow down this process. So they act like they are opposing conversion and they agree with our views, but in fact their action shows that they are not.We should learn from history, how these (British) people cunningly cheated us by favoring one till their work is done and killing the same person once no use from him.We request all our Hindu leaders to continue the effort of awakening Hindus and building the great nation.We can have dialogue with them at the same time we should not disclose our course of action. We are from the land of CHANAKYA and should use at least some of his techniues to safe guard ourselves.Missionaries are never trust worthy.It was so, it is so, it will be so.Keep distance with them.
    EDUCATION AND HEALTH CARE MUST BE GIVEN IMPORTANCE THAN RELIGIONBy: B SGANESH, BANGALORE | 16-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward Just as our pliticians are after power by any means most Christian missioneries are after conversion by giving various incentives. One reason for this is our politics is based on religion, caste minority majority instead of uniform treatment of all citizens. It is high time education and health care are given impotance free from corruption so that problems get reduced.B SGANESH, BANGALORE
    saba dharma samobhavaBy: shurkumishra | 15-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward dear kulkarneejee,it is a welcome step if the non-hindu religious leaders realise that all religions are equal. but it has to be practised in practical field in true spirit. then there is no need of sending huge money from abroad to india on the agenda of conversion. the missionaries should not pressurise the govt for reservation to converted sc and st with the aim of converting more sc/st to christianity.as for u in ur article u mentioned about innocent christians killing but conviniently forgot abut the killing of swami lakshmananda and why he was killed and who r the ppl who killed him. everybody speaks about gujrat but nobody is bothered about godhra killing. by the way have u bothered to write something about kashmiri pandits? preaching is something and practice is something. we all want to live in piece with equal oppertunity to all and favour to none. are u n and ur politicians and the religious leaders will bring ti to practice. we earnestly hope they do.
    Conversion - Dialogue with VeticanBy: dhawan | 15-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward Proseytization is intrinsic to Christianity. So all promises will soon be broken. There should be a Law agaist conversion and any conversion should be treated as an act of terrorism. Yes it is an attack on the soul and beleif of the person who is converted to other faith. Conversion from Hinduism to Islam for marrying second time without divorcing the first wife is common. Similarly for geting benefits from Christian Institutions has been big allurement for certain people. Both conversions are debased in the eyes of a true relegion and hence should be banned.
    A sweet Word and a Gun!By: Rajendra K. Gupta | 15-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward Among Christians, proselytizing, from one Christian denomination to another, is a dirty word. There are no heart warming dialogs about it; the rule is just don’t do it. When evangelical ministers began to attract large audiences of Catholics to their sermons in South America, Pope John Paul II attacked them with a venom that would make the VHP leaders blush! If someone should convert a Muslim to Christianity, they would both face certain death. The Jews protest vehemently at any reference to Christ as the saviour. But the Vatican insists on converting the Hindus, as it sees them as a soft target, and bitterly opposes a ban on conversions. It is for the Hindus to convince the predatory religions that their good old days are over. A sweet word and a gun are always more effective than just a sweet word! Sniveling imbeciles like Kulkarni serve as the useful idiots for Christianity and Islam.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.