Act as per law against Myanmar asylum-seekers, HC tells police
Top Stories
- Rs 20L seized from Ajit Chandila relative's home, another ex-cricketer held
- Indian American teen Eesha Khare invents wondrous 20-sec charger, Google eyes bid
- India and China ask SRs to work on more border steps
- Can't charge man with rape over consensual sex even if marriage eludes: Supreme Court
- Saudi Arabian authorities refuse to accept new Indian passports
A day after the DDA wrote to the Delhi Police to jointly conduct a "squatters' removal programme" at the Sultangarhi monument near Vasant Kunj, around 2,200 asylum seekers from Myanmar living there were asked to evacuate the area on Tuesday.
The refugees have been camping near the 13th-century protected monument hoping to get a "plot of land" and other benefits in the Capital.
The action was after the Delhi High Court on Monday turned down a request for "compassionate indulgence" in the matter and asked the police to take action as prescribed under the law.
A bench headed by Acting Chief Justice A K Sikri underlined that the Myanmar refugees were in India for almost two years now and have been waiting for legal "refugee" status given by the United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR).
Standing counsel for Delhi government Najmi Waziri informed the court that it was not like that the asylum-seekers had come to India recently, but had travelled to Delhi from across the country on the basis of an "unofficial rumour" that they would be getting plots of land here, besides several other benefits.
"The matter, however, involves questions of utmost sensitivity, keeping in view their legal status in this country, their conditions and the kind of agitations. There are intelligence reports indicating the matter must be tactfully handled," said Waziri as he produced all the reports in the court. After going through the documents, the court noted that most of these refugees did not even have the temporary refugee cards allotted to them by the UNHCR and had come to the city on the basis of "certain unsubstantiated reports".
"We fail to understand how this court can interfere in such a situation. It is not like they have come to India just now and are demanding a refugee status.... It is not Delhi's problems... police and authorities should have the liberty to do whatever is prescribed under the law," the court said. The case to ascertain the legal status of these refugees will now be heard on Wednesday.
... contd.
Editors’ Pick
- 'Sophisticated' Indian cyberattacks targeted Pak military sites: Report
- Talkative Li quoted Weber, Hegel, Jobs, said PM is large-hearted
- Bihar food corp ends up with chaff as rice worth Rs 535 cr vanishes from mills
- In 7 lucrative minutes on May 9, Sreesanth bowled six balls, bookie made Rs 2.5 cr
- India and China ask border envoys to work on more steps
- Former Ranji player among 3 more held
- Rajasthan Royals to file FIR against tainted trio
- Family of theft accused allege police torture
- IVF breakthrough can triple number of births: Scientists
- After Khalid’s death, Muslim leaders want govt to make Nimesh panel report public
- Meteoroid impact triggers bright flash on the moon
- Cobrapost sting: NABARD chief gives clean chit to co-operative banks


Inspector, live-in partner found dead in Gurgaon
Won't overrule DU's 4-year plan: Shashi Tharoor at Google+ hangout
To beat cancer, Stanford professor reaches out to Keralites in Delhi and elsewhere
Woman alleges gang-rape by husband, in-laws




















