Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

After 7/11, Mumbai Police drew a roadmap, trashed it on 26/11

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Mumbaiattack
    ATS chief Karkare with his predecessor K P Raghuvanshi near CST on Nov 26. FILE

    If the first images that streamed across the nation on the night of November 26 were chaotic and confused, that defined the first response of a 44,000-member police force too. This, in a city that’s no stranger to terror — in the six years before 26/11, Mumbai saw 14 terrorist attacks that killed over 250 people.

    And yet, constables rushed out of police stations without weapons only to find the attackers had fled when they returned with their archaic guns. Despite a clear deployment plan in place for such an emergency, over a dozen top police officers — whose job was to lead, plan and coordinate — rushed to attack sites armed with little other than their sense of duty. Result: across the city that night, there sprang up as many control centres as there were officers.

    Not only did this fuel panic in the force, it delayed a concerted response by more than 10 hours when each second was precious.

    Ads by Google

    It wasn’t meant to be this way.

    For, the Mumbai Police has a clearly established standard operating procedure (SOP) for such crises. Put in place way back in 1993 after the serial bomb blasts, it called for a Deputy Commissioner of Police (Operations) to take charge of his area to co-ordinate responses, introduced assault vehicles into the force and after the 7/11 train bombings, it included setting up a unified command-and-control centre.

    Within an hour of the attack, however, that SOP was itself the first casualty.

    ... contd.

    Next1234
    But why this late?By: Rajan | 03-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward OK. The job was mishandled as always. But it is strange that you publish this article NOW, AFTER THE ELECTIONS! Why not before the elections? I feel the media is not duty bound. failing in their job,. And after the Govt Advt.revenue. Mostly keepingmum over the wrong doings of the Govt. This is a bad sign and not good for the nation. Be bold, your duty is for the people, For once forget Money.DO YOUR DUTY FEARLESSLY.TWELL ME .IS THE PRESENT GOVT. DOING THINGS CORRECTLY AGAINST TERRORISTS/WHY THE DRAGGING OF FEET OVER LONG CONVICTED TERRORISTS. LESS TALK AND MORE PUNISHMENT FOR CRIMES. THEY SEEM TO BE STRAINING TO DIG UP OLD CASES THAN PUNISHING THE PRESENT MURDERES.NO ONE CAN SAVE INDIAN AAM JANATHA. THE GOVERNMENT IS OFF THE PEOPLE,FAR FROM THE PEOPLE AND BUYING/BOUGHT BY THE RICH PEOPLEGOD SASVE US
    High time police becomes truthful to their professionBy: Mohammed Sabir | 03-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward Commendable job by your reporters.. The police force need to rise above its laid back attitude and for a change without abusing their power on weaker class and communal bias, raise their standards and at least now emerge as a force which can be trusted.
    sorry staye of affairsBy: iyer vs | 03-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward No comments, because we are bond to live this fashion or who will vote the same party and that also in mumbai after such a big mistake. And now see this is going to happen in regular basis because you have to wait for another five difficult years. This minister resigned and fellow was removed is all eye washing. Because I have a serrious thinking that these people are also involved, let them proove themself inocent to the court of law, but that is also currupted.
    Media plays it both waysBy: R.Kannnan | 03-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward I am unable to understand the criticism of the Police officers. By your own account, they rushed to trouble spots. If they had strictly followed the manual, the media criticism would have been even more harsh.The trouble is the failiure occured earlier - even before the terrorists landed in Mumbai. Apparently, Coast Guard and Navy had information about possible attack by sea and did not take it seriously. Action then would have prevented the incident.Let us say JCP Prasad was in control room in place of JCP Maria. Would that have reduced casualty by even one person ?We need to accept two facts :1. The navy gets away by talking about absence of actionable intelligence.This is not correct. Intelligence inputs are rarely specific and failiure to take corrective action must be analysed to prevent recurrence.2.Command structure without specific anti terrorist training will not work. We saw exceptional bravery bypolicemen, and others involved, but that is not enough.
    the Mumbai storyBy: ABJ ABJ | 03-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward Please continue such investigative journalism.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.