Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

All third class

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • The railway ministry has been told what’s wrong. The Passenger Amenities Committee that has been set up — and is headed by the well-known painter Subhaprasanna from, where else, Kolkata — pointed out that train windows are frequently hazy, robbing a train journey of that sense of connection to the countryside that should be so central to the experience. It shouldn’t take a painter’s eye to see the obvious; but then, in a sector as unreformed and sarkari as the railways, what do you expect?

    But it is another recommendation that deserves highlighting. “Specially designed luxury coaches,” we are told, would be a good idea, as long as they are “exclusively meant for foreign travellers.” This sums up what is wrong with much thinking, both about tourism and about railway (and similar) infrastructure in India. The first assumption is that, for tourism, somehow creating parallel systems that foreigners should use (an odd 21st century version of the old socialist “dollar shops”), setting up parallel costs at heritage sites, and so on, will somehow make tourists feel more comfortable. That is aside from the fact that, in practice, those running the systems find them impossible to run easily, as is the case with so many silly regulations.

    Ads by Google

    And then there is what it implies for how we think about infrastructure in India. Nothing good, we seem to believe, can be given to us, because we will somehow spoil it. Indian tourists who can afford to pay shouldn’t be allowed near the special coaches, because they will manage to ruin the experience. This flies in the face of what we have learnt over the last few decades; most recently the case of the Delhi Metro showed that the urban Indian is as capable of respecting the value of infrastructure when she recognises its worth as anyone else — and, indeed, of creating a civic culture around it. Maybe what holds back excellence in customer service and user-friendly infrastructure in railways, for example, isn’t just sarkari incompetence. We should not underestimate the lack of trust for the Indian citizen — the customer — that goes with that.

    Reminding British RajBy: sudhir agrawal | 30-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward What I understand from this is- special luxury Coaches will be provided for FOREIGN TOURIST ONLY and no Indian Tourist will be allowed to travel in these special coaches! If it is correct- Doesn't it reminds of old British Raj and other places such as South Africa and India too with the Board" INDIANS
    Bastards IndiansBy: Sunil Sharma | 29-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward UPA ass licking of foreigners continues ...as they lick the ass of Sonia so should they lick of all foreigners...this is congress culture!! Subjugate to foreigners!! Idiots who have proposed this!!
    Corporate IndiaBy: Syed Muhammad Nadir | 29-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward What else can a common man in India have other than this, where the leader of the ruling party is a Gori ma`m sahib and the Prime Minister of the country, being an economist, thinks about swollen accounts not the national pride.
    Am I a foreigner?By: Prasad | 29-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward Who is a foreigner? Will I be a foreigner because I hold a foreign passport? Or would I be thrown out because my skin color is not as exotic as my secretary’s? Would my good old burly buddy from South Africa in suit be considered foreign enough or the foreigner should be a filthy backpacker high on drugs from some nondescript western country? Would the Indian hosts of a foreigner be allowed to travel with the foreign guests? Would the marriage tourists from OIC be considered foreigners or towelheads? What about their child brides? If a compartment is suitable for native Indians why is it not suitable for foreigners? If the same kind of discrimination is made elsewhere, Indian press would have called it racism (Oh Gandhiji!).The root cause of the problem is that the Indian public elects idiots to political offices, allows dimwits to become public servants, and behaves like animals in public. Indians should acquire some pride of being Indians. Then everything will fall in place!
    Carefull when India.By: YD | 30-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward Most likely you will be thrown out. I took a group of tourists to India and when we went to see taj mahal I was told by a policeman "you go through Indian gate not with white sahibs", when I said that I live in Australia and this is my group and I owned the company, the policeman compelled me to go through the seprate gate. Now have a guess what whites in the group might have thought. Nehru had said that he is the last 'British' PM of India, Congress made sure "Indians and dog not allowed" stays. Now Indians cann't be PM without the permission of Italians.
    all third classBy: kailsh oberoi | 29-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward "Dogs and Indians not allowed" written on the new coaches will remind us that we were once slave and we are still mentally slave. utter disgusting.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.