Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Ally’s ally?

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice’s objectives in New Delhi were to express solidarity with the Indian people after the Mumbai aggression and buy time to prevent an escalation of the gathering tension with Pakistan into a military conflict. India is obviously thankful for the first and rightly circumspect on the second. Rice is urging New Delhi to maintain its current restraint to avoid unintended consequences from a potential retaliation. Rice wants

    India to allow some space for international diplomacy before it exercises its uncontested right to retaliate against the Mumbai provocation that has followed a number of recent attacks from Pakistan-based terror groups with increasing frequency and growing audacity. As Rice headed to Islamabad from New Delhi, America’s top soldier, Admiral Mike Mullen was travelling in the other direction. This US diplomatic two-step is likely to be followed by a host of other high-profile visitors from the international community.

    Ads by Google

    As she headed to Islamabad, Rice pressed Pakistan for a “robust response” to bring the perpetrators of the Mumbai attack to justice and prevent the recurrence of such aggression. As the days ahead unfold, however, she may not find it easy to persuade Pakistan to match its nice words after Mumbai with credible deeds. In New Delhi, Rice certainly rejected Pakistan President Asif Ali Zardari’s search for an escape route by blaming “non-state actors”. Rice reminded Zardari that the Pakistani state has the responsibility to act against terrorists operating from its soil. The issue is not legal but political. Both Washington and New Delhi know that Zardari has neither the power nor the authority to act against groups like Lashkar-e-Toiba, that have served as a long lance against India for the Pakistan army and the ISI.

    If Washington has found it so difficult to get the Pakistan army to crack down on the Taliban and

    Al-Qaeda on its western borders, there is little reason for India to believe that Rice and Mullen can get the ISI to change its colours on India. Nevertheless, it is in India’s own interest to give some time and space for US diplomatic efforts in Pakistan. When India decides to use military force against Pakistan, that action must be seen across the world as legitimate and a consequence of Islamabad’s failure to cooperate. New Delhi, however, can’t wait for too long. The UPA government, we hope, has not left the United States in any doubt that it expects quick and decisive results from Pakistan.

    Terror attackBy: sunit | 05-Dec-2008 Reply | Forward What has happened is the reverse of Bollywood movie 'Abtak Chappan' The sheer audacity of the strike exposed the unpreparedness of our Government machinery, despite several warning shots like Kargil, and bomb blasts. It was easy for the Government to make politically right statements in the past when many common people lost their lives, since these were 'expendable'. No action was taken to apprehend culprits and prevent them in future. Meanwhile, the terrorists have gained strength and stockpiled explosives and guns. But this time it is different in that large number of tourists and business people were killed. This has attracted International attention and India is bracketed among the danger spots. Our disaster response techniques are primitive and seem to be half-hearted. Our incompetence has been seriously and shamelessly exposed.
    Time for action pack Bollywood movies are OVERBy: Jatinder S Hoon | 05-Dec-2008 Reply | Forward Time for action pack bollywood movies are over.India should get ready for response, for its time and place of choosing.India known for its curry's should not hurry, but plan meticulously and hit it where it hurt most.Be prepared for war with Pakistan ISI, because they will not go down without fighting as they know the whole world know their nefarious activities and nobody except their jahadies groups formed by them will give them moral and may be again may be help them, as the group has an agenda of it own.
    Good NewsBy: Manish Joddar | 05-Dec-2008 Reply | Forward These are very encouraging moves
    Dear Horse of DiplomacyBy: Raj | 05-Dec-2008 Reply | Forward Enough is ENough... Diplomacy is a dead horse when it come to Pakistan.. You can't make it run whoever flogs it. Be it India or International Community, you can make dear horse of diplomacy run... It require now military action against Pak... final one.
    UN SECURITY COUNCIL TO TAKE CHARGE OF THIS ISSUE OF TERRORISM.By: ANJAN KUMAR SAMAL | 05-Dec-2008 Reply | Forward It is the first and foremost duty of the government of India to convince the UN security council with the existing prove in hand that Pakistan is not only the threat for India but also a global threat.we have to also fight our own war without depending on USA .Because recently Condoliza's visit shows the double standard of her statements,one in India and other in Pakistan.The world knows the truth that Pakistan is the breeding ground of terrorism.So it is the right time for the UN security council to take this issue of Pakitan as the global threat and should act positive to curb the global terrorism.What happened in Mumbai may be happened any where in the world that must be understood by the UN security council. whole world expect something positive from the side of UN security council to save the world from the dangerous and deadly global terrorism.It is also quite evident that in the name of democracy the entire Pakistan is actually under the rule of ISI and it's Military.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.