Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

An hour from Singur, a Tata story - just the opposite

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Front
    Protest in Singur against Mamata Banerjee for the Tata pullout. Express photo Subham Datta
    Announcing the Nano pull-out from West Bengal, Ratan Tata referred to the Tata Cancer Centre coming up in the Rajarhat township, on the outskirts of Kolkata, as the bridge that remains between the group and the government of Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee. That hospital is spread over just 13.40 acres of Government land but there is another Tata project on a scale as big as the Nano — and which is moving quietly ahead as per script.

    Barely an hour’s drive from Singur, the Tata Telcon project in Kharagpur, a joint venture with Hitachi for making heavy earth-moving vehicles, also involved acquisition of agricultural land by the government right next to National Highway 6 (Kolkata-Mumbai highway).

    Land acquisition began in June-July 2006 almost simultaneously with the Nano project in Singur. The Tata Telcon project envisages an industrial park of 1251.49 acres — Nano’s was 997 acres — of which the state government’s West Bengal Industrial Development Corporation has already acquired 967.96 acres. An estimated 80 per cent of this is agricultural. To date, Rs 63 crore has been paid as compensation to farmers and landholders. There are no “unwilling farmers” so far.

    Ads by Google

    The main Tata factory here will cover 562 acres — the equivalent in Singur was about 650 acres — and the total investment in the project, including that by vendors, is expected to be around Rs 2000 crore. Like Singur, besides the main plant, several vendors form part of the project. The state government and WBIDC have successfully acquired and allotted land to key vendors.

    Consider the following:

    Telcon has its own vendor unit spread over 250 acres and will invest over Rs 500 crore.

    Tractors India has got 50 acres and will invest Rs 220 crore

    Arcon, a Canada-based vendor, has got 12 acres and is estimated to invest Rs 120 crore.

    York Consultant, a Tata holding company based in Singapore, has got 40 acres and is estimated to invest Rs 80 crore.

    US-based vendor P and H, specialising in coal mining equipment, has got 20 acres and is estimated to invest around Rs 60 crore.

    “The Tata Telcon project is running smoothly. We have acquired land for the company and construction work has started recently,” said Subrata Gupta, MD, WBIDC. So why was land acquisition here smoother? The answers, officials admit, are hard to find. “Our compensation package was the normal one — Rs 8 lakh-Rs 11 lakh per acre, depending on the crop pattern on the land, which is primarily agricultural. (For Nano, the rates were Rs 9 -12 lakh). Just like in Singur, we held a regular dialogue at the grassroots level. We paid 25 per cent of the land price to recorded bargadars, which is also what was done in Singur,” said N S Nigam, District Magistrate, West Midnapore, in which the project falls. “Everyone cooperated, including the Opposition Trinamool Congress,” said Nigam. Asked why, Nigam said: “There was more attention on Singur. Maybe the stakes were higher given the publicity over Nano, the world’s cheapest car, and the firm deadline. Kharagpur was in the backyard and things proceeded here quietly from the spotlight.” In fact, an official said that Singur’s proximity to Kolkata — a mere 40-minute drive away — made it easier as a target since protesters had easy access to it. The area, dominated by the CPM, has a strong Trinamool and Congress base. A portion of the industrial park falls under Congress MLA Gyan Singh Sohon Pal’s Assembly constituency and the Lok Sabha seat falls under Probodh Panda of CPI. Said Partho Chatterjee, TMC leader and leader of the Opposition: “The right political atmosphere has been created there so therefore we did not protest. But Singur is different.”

    Asked to explain what he meant by the right “atmosphere,” Chatterjee declined to comment. There may not be clear-cut answers as to why this is different from Nano but one thing is clear: no one in the government is complaining.

    learn to keep silenceBy: AMBRISH | 08-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward I think such details should not have been given as it would just invite trouble
    NANO VS TELCONBy: yohan | 05-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward it is crystal clear now that mamata had big stakes in singur, due to the automobile industry and Tata Auto's industrial adversaries have bought mamata. it would be worth enquiring her wealth prior to singur, now and after 1 year. the income tax directorate may kindly note this point. despite many of the 'unwilling' (deliberate creation of mamata) farmers finally agreeing to accept the package, mamta was insisting on 400 acre land, which clearly shows her undue interest in the issue. Her arrogance and tirade challenging the govt, court and the system will boomerang and see her political fall shortly.
    Singur IssueBy: V.Kadal Amutham | 05-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward A nice story to here. But what went wrong in Singur? The question remains in Singur, Why TATAs did not directly negotiate with farmers and ensure they are adequately compensated? TATAs would have offered the farmers with double amount of land else where with all financial and technical and marketing support to the farmers to start life afresh?
    Tata and its contributionBy: Anjana | 05-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward Thank you Mr Tata, I had cancer 12 years back and I was treated at the Tata Cancer Hospital at Bombay. That time I have seen how cancer patients from Bengal used to be the major parts of the crowd there.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.