Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

An offer you can’t refuse

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • As most rural parts of Nepal will be busy harvesting paddy crops, the Communist Party of Nepal-Maoists (CPN-M) will be spearheading what it calls the decisive ‘third people’s revolt’ to capture power in Kathmandu. Soon after CPN-M Chief Prachanda’s return from his weeklong visit to China, the party set a November 1 deadline, to launch the ‘revolt’ that aims to establish itself as the sole controller of power.

    The Maoists have put forward clear pre-conditions should government and the parties opposed want to avoid such a revolt. First, Prime Minister Madhav Nepal, who they have declared a ‘puppet of foreign lords’, should quit. Second, President Rambaran Yadav should either publicly admit he was wrong in reinstating the army chief, sacked by Prachanda in his capacity as the prime minister in May, or the House should debate that move in a manner the Maoists want.

    Ads by Google

    But the Maoists have thus far refused to accept most other parties’ advice that if at all they are keen on debating the President’s act, they must bring forward an impeachment motion.

    As Nepal’s unique parliamentary practice envisages an ideal atmosphere in the House — any obstruction or slogan shouting by members individually or in group lead to adjournments — Maoists have stalled its proceedings for the past three months. The government has not been able to have its budget passed because of such obstruction and now has less than two weeks time.

    The consequence are obvious. In fact, Maoists have moved smartly in the past five months after Prachanda’s resignation as prime minister. Driving away a ‘puppet prime minister’ from power is part of a move to establish what they call ‘nationalism’. At the same time, Maoists have been able to project President Yadav as a dictator who went against a popularly elected government over the army chief reinstatement issue. They insist that the president’s act must be reversed if the principle of civilian supremacy is to be honoured.

    ... contd.

    Next123
    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.