Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Anti-Dinakaran lawyers lock up two judges

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Bangalore lawyers, who had called a day-long boycott of the courts in protest against Karnataka Chief Justice P D Dinakaran, today locked up two senior judges of the High Court in a court hall for over an hour.

    The protest by the Bangalore Advocates Association disrupted functioning in courts across the city. In the High Court, papers, pens were thrown at judges in one of the court halls and there was slogan-shouting in the court hall of Justice Dinakaran who is facing allegations of impropriety and land encroachment in neighbouring Tamil Nadu. A decision on his elevation to the Supreme Court is pending.

    In Court Hall No. 1 of the High Court, Justice Dinakaran had begun hearing cases as part of a division bench when over 200 advocates barged into the room and demanded that all lawyers leave the hall. At this, Justice Dinakaran pleaded with lawyers to let him perform his constitutional duties but was shouted down. As lawyers forced the court to adjourn proceedings, some members of the media, who were suspected of filming the protest, were attacked by the advocates.

    Ads by Google

    In most court halls, judges quietly agreed to the demand of the advocates but in Court Hall No. 2, the second-in-command after the Chief Justice, Justice V Gopal Gowda, and Justice B V Nagarathna, who was part of a special bench that stayed the advocates’ association resolution, refused to give in when the lawyers barged in.

    This led to nearly an hour of slogan-shouting, hurling of pens and paper, banging of bookcases in the courtroom and lifting of chairs. But Justice Gopal Gowda refused to budge from his seat. The advocates then came out of the court hall and locked all four doors of the room and used benches as barricades.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    APEX COURT IS RESPONSIBLEBy: M.R.VARADARAJAN | 10-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward IF THE APEX COURT HAD ACTED SWIFTLY THIS INCIDENT WOULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED AT ALL. BY THEIR SILENCE ON THE MATTER APEX COURT HAS PROVED THEY HAVE DIFFERENT FOR OTHERS AND FOR JUDICIAL MEMBERS. THIS HAS DEFINATELY DENTED THE CONFIDENCE GENERAL PUBLIC HAS ON THE APEX COURT.
    Way to go lawyersBy: Jeevs | 10-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Uphold the law.. set an example.. am proud of you all
    Justice delayed !By: Gopal | 10-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward This is a clear case of justice delayed. The controversies surrounding Justice Dinakaran came to the CJI's knowledge quite long back. The collegium has held back his elevation owing to the charges against Justice Dinakaran.When the District Collector has already submitted his report on the land grabbing in TN, there was no need to verify the veracity of the same. The CJI should dispose of this case immediately in the public interest and uphold probity in public life.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.