Mini Kapoor

It's cricket


Mini Kapoor

Apex court dismisses Sangma’s plea against Pranab

Ads by Google

The Supreme Court on Wednesday dismissed former LS speaker P A Sangma's petition challenging senior Congress leader Pranab Mukherjee's election as the President.

Chief Justice Altamas Kabir, who led the 3:2 majority ruling, held that Sangma's petition was not maintainable for regular hearing. However, the two dissenting judges — Justices J Chelameswar and Ranjan Gogoi — held that the petition deserves regular hearing.

While Justice Chelameswar said he will give the reasons for dissenting with majority order next week, Justice Gogoi said since it was alleged that Mukherjee was holding the office-of-profit as the chairman of the Indian Statistical Institute (ISI) when he filed the nomination papers for the presidential election, Sangma petition was fit for a regular hearing.

Sangma has contended that Mukherjee was holding offices of profit as chairman ISI, Kolkata and as also the leader of the Congress Party in Lok Sabha when he had entered the presidential race.

Earlier, the court had taken on record a short affidavit from Mukherjee, who said the grounds for challenging his election was "ex-facie misconceived."

Attorney General GE Vahanvati, who assisted the court, had opposed Sangma's plea, saying "no pecuniary benefits was attached to the post of chairman of ISI. Moreover, the post must be such where the office-bearers can be influenced by the appointing authority".

Ads by Google
Please read our terms of use before posting comments
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
comments powered by Disqus