SC imposes 'Lakshman rekha' guideline on media reporting
Top Stories
- Rs 20L seized from Ajit Chandila relative's home, another ex-cricketer held
- India and China ask SRs to work on more border steps
- Can't charge man with rape over consensual sex even if marriage eludes: Supreme Court
- Saudi Arabian authorities refuse to accept new Indian passports
- FIR filed against Facebook for not discontinuing hate page

Highlights:
* Supreme Court says it can't frame guidelines on media reporting across the board.
* SC says temporary postponement on reporting a matter can be sought by aggrieved party by moving appropriate court.
* Journalists should know the 'Lakshman Rekha' so that they don't cross the line of contempt, SC says.
* Freedom of speech and expression is not an absolute right under our Constitution, says the apex court.
* SC says doctrine of postponement of reporting has been evolved as a preventive measure and not as a prohibitive and punitive measure.
* SC says doctrine of postponement of reporting has been evolved as a preventive measure and not as a prohibitive and punitive measure.
* The reasonable restriction on publication of court proceedings is for societal interest.
The Supreme Court today laid down a constitutional principle where aggrieved parties can seek from appropriate court the postponement of the publication of court hearings and a decision taken on a case-by-case basis.
The court, however, refrained from framing broad guidelines for reporting of sub-judice court matters, saying it cannot be done "across the board."
The bench observed that freedom of speech and expression is not an absolute right under the Constitution and the journalists should understand the 'Lakshman rekha' so that they do not cross the line of contempt.
A five-judge bench headed by Chief Justice S H Kapadia said it was laying down the constitutional principle which will allow the aggrieved parties to seek from appropriate court the postponement of the publication of court hearings.
The bench said the concerned court will decide the question of postponement of reporting court proceedings on case-by-case basis.
"We are not framing guidelines but we have laid down constitutional principle and appropriate writ courts will decide when the postponement order has to be passed on case-by -case basis," the bench also comprising justices D K Jain, S S Nijjar, Ranjana Prakash Desai and J S Khehar said.
... contd.
ALSO READ
Editors’ Pick
- Former Ranji player among 3 more held
- Rajasthan Royals to file FIR against tainted trio
- If found guilty, BCCI to ask ICC to erase Sreesanth records
- Top cops among 42 named in death of blast accused
- Manmohan-Li talks: PM takes tough line on incursion issue
- Security forces blame Maoists, villagers say CoBRA man was killed in 'friendly fire'
- Travellers’ nightmare: Yellow fever vaccine stocks run out, production unit awaits repair


Indebted to tune of Rs 4,500 cr, Deccan Chronicle Holdings promoters’ properties attached
Warren Buffett unseats Amancio Ortega to become world's 3rd richest person
Videocon's D2H arm Bharat Business Channel gets Sebi nod for Rs 700 cr IPO
Rupert Murdoch faces 600 fresh NoTW phone-hacking claims




















