Army tribunal defends dismissal of unfit officer, says maintaining physical standards ‘paramount’
Related
Top Stories
- Former Ranji player held, Sreesanth and others to be produced in court today
- India, China have wisdom to address bounday issue: Li Keqiang
- All eyes on Narendra Modi as BJP set to discuss strategy for Lok Sabha polls
- In 7 lucrative minutes on May 9, Sreesanth bowled 6 balls, bookie made Rs 2.5 cr
- SC agrees to hear PIL to stay IPL matches due to spot-fixing
The Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT) has held that the maintenance of physical and medical standards is "paramount" in the Army while dismissing the plea by a Junior Commissioned Officer (JCO) of Jammu and Kashmir Light Infantry (JAKLI), Hushar Singh, opposing his discharge from service by the Army on medical grounds.
The AFT bench, comprising of judicial member Justice Rajesh Chandra and administrative member, Lt Gen N S Brar (retd) held that it does not find any ground "to interfere'' in the discharge of the petitioner. While performing the duties as signal JCO, Hushar Singh was discharged from service after it was found that "he was incapable of performing the duties competently in an infantry battalion."
Singh had said that he had suffered the injuries during a counter-insurgency operation, The respondents, through their counsel, Sandeep Bansal, however said that the petitioner's claim was false as he had received injuries in a vehicle accident. It was also brought to the notice of the Tribunal that the JCO being on crutches could not have performed the duties in a high altitude area where his unit was being deployed.
The respondents also informed the Tribunal that the petitioner was retained in service and granted extension as long as the unit was in peace station and even under such conditions he was unable to perform the assigned duties that required a frequent change of appointments far before the usual two years.
The respondents also told the Tribunal that retaining the petitioner in service beyond the pensionable service was not in the public interest, as a number of qualified individuals were awaiting promotions that were held up due to non-availability of vacancies.
Passing the orders, the Tribunal held that there can be "no two opinions'' that the requirement of maintaining acceptable physical and medical standards in the Army is paramount and accommodation of those not meeting these standards is an exception driven by welfare considerations and not the rule or right.
... contd.
Editors’ Pick
- 'Sophisticated' Indian cyberattacks targeted Pak military sites: Report
- Talkative Li quoted Weber, Hegel, Jobs, said PM is large-hearted
- Bihar food corp ends up with chaff as rice worth Rs 535 cr vanishes from mills
- In 7 lucrative minutes on May 9, Sreesanth bowled 6 balls, bookie made Rs 2.5 cr
- India and China ask border envoys to work on more steps
- Former Ranji player among 3 more held
- Rajasthan Royals to file FIR against tainted trio
- Family of theft accused allege police torture
- IVF breakthrough can triple number of births: Scientists
- After Khalid’s death, Muslim leaders want govt to make Nimesh panel report public
- Meteoroid impact triggers bright flash on the moon
- Cobrapost sting: NABARD chief gives clean chit to co-operative banks


Baying for Bansal’s blood, ABVP members canecharged
Parties take to streets, demand Bansal’s resignation, say shamed City Beautiful
Civils: Panchkula doc bags 17th rank in first attempt
Ruchika molestation case: Sacred Heart School’s recognition hinges on HC verdict’


















