At Orient-Express, board of directors holds all the cards
Related
Top Stories
- Spot-fixing: Chandila was in touch with four sets of bookies, says Delhi Police
- Chinese Premier Li Keqiang arrives, to hold talks with PM on boundary, water issues
- IPL 2013: Delhi Daredevils crash to defeat, finish last
- Jaganmohan's wife attacks CBI, accuses it of working at Congress behest
- Blast accused death: UP govt seeks CBI probe, FIR against 42 persons
Steven M Davidoff
Orient-Express Hotels, the Bermuda-based owner of luxury hotels, has received an unsolicited offer to be acquired by the Indian Hotels Company, a subsidiary of the Tata Group. In surveying the potential battle for control, I am certain of only one thing: It's good to be a director of Orient-Express — and it's likely to stay that way.
It's not because Orient-Express's chairman gets to stay at the hotels for free, or that other directors get a 75% discount. Or that these directors have largely served without consequence despite Orient-Express's poor performance.
Rather, it is because these directors can elect themselves, a unique characteristic among companies worldwide. Shareholders have no real say in the selection of Orient-Express's directors.
Orient-Express's shares are divided into Class A and Class B shares, with the Class B shares controlling 64% of the votes. Who owns the Class B shares? It is actually Orient-Express itself. The shares are owned by a company subsidiary and voted by the four directors of the subsidiary, two of whom are also directors of Orient-Express.
The reason this structure exists is because of a unique Bermuda law. In 2000, Orient-Express was slowly spun out of Sea Containers, a now-defunct shipping company. Sea Containers gradually sold off its shares.
But the executives of the shipping company apparently wanted to ensure that even if Sea Containers' stake went below 50%, the company would be safe from a hostile bid. They accomplished this by placing majority voting control with this subsidiary. And because two of the four directors on this subsidiary are also directors of Orient-Express, they are necessary for any action with respect to these shares. The other two directors, by the way, are lawyers at Orient-Express's law firm, Appleby Global.
It's a structure that wouldn't be allowed under Delaware law, but one that effectively gives the directors control over the company. This wouldn't be so bad, except Orient-Express has a history of poor performance.
... contd.
Editors’ Pick
- Quake-hit and shaken, Bhaderwah spends nights in the open
- UP blast accused dies on way to jail, govt wanted to drop case against him
- Former civil aviation secy changes mind, seeks airport security exemption as EC
- BCCI suspects Gujarat players in other teams were also approached
- Police on money trail, Sreesanth in fresh trouble
- Chhattisgarh 'encounter' leaves 8 villagers dead, no Maoist link yet
- Chinese Premier Li Keqiang arrives today, PM to seek early revival of border talks




Google moves to end EU antitrust probe without fine
EU weighs iPhone sale deals
Mila Kunis becomes face of luxury jewellery company Gemfields
Next iPhone to have thinner screen



















