Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Atram’s case exposes MPs’ antipathy towards wildlife

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Personal Loan

    The chinkara hunting case in Pune that eventually led to the resignation of Maharashtra’s Transport Minister Dharmaraobaba Atram, has brought to the fore worrisome aspects of wildlife governance in the country. With the kind of evidence that has surfaced over the past few days, the plot seems to have thickened for Atram. His admission that he was near the spot of hunting on the night of June 14, the recovery of partially burnt hair and skin of a wild animal seized from the Minister’s farmhouse in Pachgani near Mahabaleshwar are too strong for Atram to brush it aside as a “campaign by his political rivals”.

    All of it is now before a court in Saswad town. Apparently, after an initial hitch, the Government, too, appears to have been yielding under intense media pressure over the issue. The authorities, however, have chosen to be tight-lipped about it. The Chief Conservator of Forest (Pune circle) Shirish Asthana has been evading queries about even things that are now a matter of public record. There is little hope of the officials concerned saying anything to the media when they failed to inform the Principal Chief Conservator of Forest (Wildlife) B Majumdar. He was in the dark about the whole matter for more than 20 days after the incident happened.

    Ads by Google

    “I have sought a report, but haven’t yet got any response,” was his reply till about a week ago. Even the Forest Minister evaded his responsibility of informing the people about the case saying that he had decided not to give any press statement on the issue.The obfuscation of the issue by officials and the Minister suggests that there is more to the story. But it’s not just Atram whose record has been questioned. People’s representatives from all parties in the tiger-human conflict areas of Chandrapur district have displayed antipathy towards wildlife for obvious political considerations. Some of them even went to threaten the Forest Department officials claiming that if tigers were not reigned in, they knew how to take care of (read kill) the animal. The incident accentuates the level of ignorance among politicians about wildlife conservation in the state, which is one of the last repositories of the big cat in the country.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.