You are here: IE »   Story

Avoid protectionism, PM asks developed nations

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Manmohan singh
    PM said the time has come for the international economic and financial architecture to reflect contemporary economic strengths.
    Discount UK Shopping

    Asking industrialised nations to avoid protectionism in the trade of goods and services, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh said on Tuesday that it was important and necessary for the G-20 Summit to take "credible decisions" to help reverse the current slowdown and instil a confidence in the global economy.

    In a statement given before leaving for London to participate in the meeting of world leaders to discuss the economic meltdown, Singh also focussed on the need to ensure adequate flows of finances to the developing countries to overcome the reversal of international capital flows.

    Singh, who will have his maiden meeting with US President Barack Obama on Thursday, said the time has come for the international economic and financial architecture to reflect contemporary economic strengths.

    The Prime Minister, who is undertaking his first trip abroad after the coronary bypass surgery on January 24, said considerable amount of preparation has been done for the Summit.

    Ads by Google

    These preparations relate to provision of coordinated fiscal stimulus by major economies to offset the decline in private demand, agreement on a set of principles to plug loopholes and weaknesses in the supervisory and regulatory arrangements for the financial institutions, he said.

    He underlined the need to undertake effective measures designed to provide emerging and developing countries adequate resources to offset the effects of global slowdown on their economies.

    "It is important and necessary for the Summit to take credible decisions which will help to halt and reverse the current slowdown and to instill a sense of confidence in the global economy," he stressed.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    time for some protectionismBy: Anu | 10-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward The economic case against protectionism is that it distorts incentives: each country produces goods in which it has a comparative disadvantage, and consumes too little of imported goods. And under normal conditions that’s the end of the story. But these are not normal conditions. We’re in the midst of a global slowdown, with governments everywhere having trouble coming up with an effective response. How would this change if each country adopted protectionist measures that "contained" the effects of fiscal expansion within its domestic economy? Then everyone would adopt a more expansionary policy — and the world would get closer to full employment than it would have otherwise. Yes, trade would be more distorted, which is a cost; but the distortion caused by a severely underemployed world economy would be reduced. Everything I’ve just said applies only when the world is stuck in a liquidity trap; that’s where we are now though.
    Doll PMBy: Jairam | 31-Mar-2009 Reply | Forward Mr.Doll PM.. Clean up our country by exposing all Babus that have billions of black money in swiss bank.. First come out in public to take some real actions instead of hiding behind the Italian mafia lady's saree.. Useless clown..
    PM would not accept his suggestion because........By: Iliaz Syed | 31-Mar-2009 Reply | Forward The one single family with largest deposits in Swiss banks is of cours the Gandhi family, and so P.M. will never agree to this suggestion
    What about $1.5trillion stashed away in Swiss banksBy: Ajay | 31-Mar-2009 Reply | Forward Dear PM, if you put forward a request for getting the $1.5Trillion of Indian deposits in Swiss bank, all of India's worries will be taken care.
    -lost opportunityBy: Raj | 31-Mar-2009 Reply | Forward Why Vajpayee did not get it. Ajay, is there a problem? Sadly, Advani is not going to get a chance as people have relaized thta he is a big opportunist that would even sell the country.
    $ 1.5 trillionBy: Nayak | 31-Mar-2009 Reply | Forward Dear Raj,Do you read News Items? Swiss Banks have recently agreed to divulge the names only if their respective countries ask for it. They agreed recently after American Pressure.Govt. of India must cancel the license of UBS-Swiss bank to operate in India and then only they come to senses and we can get what we want.But our govt, does not want as major portion of money has gone from Congress Ministers and Babus got as bribe.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.