You are here: IE »   Story

Babri demolition meticulously planned, says Liberhan, indicts Atal, Advani

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Discount UK Shopping

    Calling them “pseudo-moderates,” the Justice Manmohan Singh Liberhan Commission of Inquiry has indicted former Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee along with current Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha L K Advani and former BJP president Murli Manohar Joshi, among others, for the demolition of the Babri Masjid on December 6, 1992.

    Citing the evidence it gathered, which includes witness statements and official records, one of the key conclusions of the Commission is said to be that the entire build-up to the demolition was meticulously planned. And there was nothing to show that these leaders were either unaware of what was going on or innocent of any wrongdoing.

    The one-man Commission probed the “sequence of events leading, and all facts and circumstances relating, to the occurrences at Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid complex on December 6, 1992” — the day the Babri Masjid was brought down by kar sevaks.

    Ads by Google

    Sources in the Union Home Ministry have confirmed to The Indian Express that the report is also severely critical of many Muslim leaders representing organizations such as the Babri Masjid Action Committee and the All India Babri Masjid Action Committee.

    The elite leaders of these Muslim organizations, the report is learnt to have observed, constituted a class of their own and were neither responsible to nor were they caring for the welfare of those they claimed to represent. These leaders failed the community by failing to put forth a logical, cohesive and consistent point of view on the dispute, both inside and outside the courts, the Commission is said to have stated.

    ... contd.

    Next1234
    Know the TruthBy: Indian | 07-Dec-2009 Reply | Forward Dear friends, I am sure whether every citizen of India is aware of the truth or not. But kindly visit ashramnewsdotcom and read what is the real truth, I am not sure why our stupid politicians are not talking about such barbaric incident happened in Ashram. If BJP is communal, what is the ruling party where arshram incident happened. Each and every citizen of India should know what is the real truth
    then what is RAj Thakrey doiing???By: Hitman | 07-Dec-2009 Reply | Forward If RSS BJP are inticing religious sentiments what is Raj Thackerey doing. All envolved in babri demolition & following Thackrey are atmost illiterate ediots. Hindu's are not allowed to worship freely in Muslim countries, we gave them free liberty here.
    It's a one sided gameBy: R.sridharan | 27-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward There is no judiciary in Islamic countries There is no liberal thought also An aggrieved person belonging to non-muslim faith cannot get justice. Even non muslims have to obey the sharia law But in India and other countries the muslims cleverly make use of the judiciary and democratic institutions to brow beat the majority Hindus and others. They employ all sorts of clever and cunning arguments to support their unreasonable stands. They refuse to sing 'Vande Mataram' which is our National song Will such a behavior be tolerated in Islamic countries? Without understanding their mindset a large number of Hindus keep on supporting them and argue their case. This ostrich -like attitude will only make the fanatical muslims bolder and bolder and one day the Hindus will be totally crushed At that time the media and the politicians of the congress,sp,RJD,BSP etc cannot come to their rescue
    Liberhanhan's cock and bull story.By: R.sridharan | 26-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward The comments by Liberhan is so silly that he sounds like a lower level congress neta. He is not a politician to use words like'vajpayee is a pseudo liberal' etc. All he was expected to do was to go into the circumstances, analyse the facts and pinpoint who or what is at blame He says religion should not be used by political parties Can he say the same thing about the muslim league? What is the need for muslim league in India especially since it was formed to secure pakistan and its' goal achieved. So let this christian sonia slave tell his cock and bull stories to someone else!
    Only in IndiaBy: Amit Tiwari | 25-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Its crazy that only in India will we bend over backwards to please aliens who invade us, first the mughals and then the british. Without trying to make this a political battle just want state certain truths - The so called Babri Masjid was not a masjid, Its a grave of Babu who invaded India and raped and plundered everything inside India. Since when do we make shrines or memorials for rapists ? But since the mughals were in powere they built it themselves while trying to remove hindu symbols and temples. They also converted a lot of the locals either by force or by other means. Today when they are no more in power and that 'shrine' is destroyed , why is it a loss to India ? Also most of my muslim friends tell me that its anti islamic to worship any tombs or idols, Also there has never been any namaz offered ever in the disputed structure in Ayodhya , So how does it hurt muslim sentiments ? Can we build any church or mosques in mecca or vatican ? Are we even allowed to go there ?
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.