Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Babri files: Liberhan panel did not summon UP officer wasn’t supposed to appear before

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Contrary to the Uttar Pradesh government’s claim, former officer on special duty (OSD) in the Home Department Subhash Bhan Sadh who was supposedly carrying the 23 “missing” files pertaining to the Ayodhya dispute when he died after an “accident” in Delhi in 2000, was not expected to appear before the Liberhan Commission.

    The secretary to the Liberhan Commission had told the Delhi Police, which investigated Subhash’s death, that no summons were issued to him to attend the commission’s proceedings or appear before it on May 1, 2000.

    However, the Uttar Pradesh government told the Delhi Police that Sadh was sent to appear before the Liberhan Commission on May 1 and 2 on behalf of the government, but he carried photocopies, not original files.

    In fact, the commission had not asked for any files, said K B Aggarwal, the then special secretary (home) in the UP government, in a communication to the Delhi Police on July 6, 2000. Also, there were no orders to carry any files to Delhi, Aggarwal said.

    Ads by Google

    The letters from the Liberhan Commission and the state government are quoted in an affidavit which T N Mohan, the then deputy commissioner in the Delhi Police Headquarters, filed in the Delhi High Court in response to a petition of Subhash’s father Bir Bhan Sadh, seeking an impartial inquiry into his son’s death.

    According to Mohan’s affidavit, the search memo of Subhash after the accident showed recovery of “some papers, including visiting cards, slips, tickets etc. No file/documents were seized or taken or found from the spot or at the hospital. No file in original or its photostat was recovered by the PCR staff, medical doctors or Sub-Inspector S L Meena” who was the first to visit the spot of the accident.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Babri FilesBy: shanthanu | 16-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward There is a saying that one can wake up a person who is sleeping but not the one who is pretending the sleep. The same is the case here. When the files are deliberately hushed up, any amount of theory for explaining the non availability of files will always elude the truth. There was an accident and only one person was affected who was carrying these files and his dying declaration was not recorded and it is not sure whether he was carrying the files or not ,whether the files were only photo copies and not original, the Police officer on duty has conveniently forgotten the details of the incidence. What is all this cock and bull story , if not a deliberate attempt to hush up the matter? And no one is responsible if such important files are missing from official custody?
    Indian JudicalBy: Neduncheziyan | 16-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward We Indian Citizen comming to know that how the Babari Masjid issue was handled. Very critical stories, very different stories, sudden accident, sudden death, strange memos, missing files, un necessary delays, action was not taken.. and so on..... Indian judical is capable to meet all these culpirts in to books to save India. We are sure.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.