Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

EC rejects BJP charge about EVM malfunction

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Elections
    Election Commission said that it is satisfied about the foolproof working of electronic voting machines.

    Rejecting BJP's charge of malfunctioning of the electronic voting machines (EVMs), the Election Commission tonight said it was satisfied about their foolproof working and it would consider measures to clear the apprehensions of political parties.

    "The EC is amply satisfied about the non-tamperability and the foolproof working of the EVMs. The Commission's confidence in the efficacy of the EVMs has been fortified by the judgments of various courts and the views of technical experts," the Commission said in its press note reacting to reports about the technological vulnerability of EVMs.

    The Commission would, however, consider all the points raised and apprehensions expressed recently by various political leaders and individuals regarding EVMs and take all necessary measures to clear doubts about use of EVMs in elections.

    The EC's clarification came in the wake of BJP leader L K Advani demanding reintroduction of ballot papers in elections, beginning with the Maharashtra Assembly polls and three other states, observing that there was every possibility of malfunctioning of EVMs.

    Ads by Google

    Noting that the Commission came across reports regarding technological vulnerability of the EVMs for possible manipulation, the EC referred to the Karnataka High Court hailing the EVMs as "a national pride".

    Referring to former Delhi Chief Secretary Omesh Sehgal’s claim that "rigging of EVMs was very much possible", the Commission said said that Sehgal had handed over a letter when he met Chief Election Commissioner Navin Chawla on June 30.

    However, no demonstration on the tamperability of the EVM has been given by Sehgal to the Commission or to its officials, nor has the Commission ordered any enquiry, as reported in a section of the Press, the EC clarified.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Thank you for appreciation. By: Twentysecond Century | 07-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward I agree it is expensive, Some of you have backup plan to support this. Budget 2009 assigned 120 Crores for biometric ID and also donations to Electoral trusts to get 100% deduction in computation of tax of the donor, What more do we need? Let's donate for the good cause and remove these parasites who have been coming to power by rigging booths in the name of humanity, religion, and poverty. Well the world is gone beyond 22nd century and we still sit in 18th century, still have pebbled roads that Roman's built in their era centuries ago. Go to a village we see huts, lamps and pebbled roads. There is no need to fight over these useless political parties, these are time tested barbarians who dwell on blood of poor Indians. We must elect the best party that would lead us into next century. TECHNOLOGY IS THE ANSWER TO KILL THESE ILLITERATE PARASITES. WE MUST LOOK FOR FRESH HORIZON PARTY in the next five years. NO CONGRESS, NO BJP. TIME TO CHANGE AND REINVENT WHEEL.
    EVMs can be tampered.By: shanthanu | 06-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Why should Omesh Saigal who has written a letter to Election Commission be asked to demonstrate in public how it is possible to tamper with the EVMs. If he proves, it should be accepted. If not rejected. Instead EC is quoting court ruling which cannot be the basis for a technological solution. And so many people calling names for those who have expressed their apprehensions after the report is uncalled for.
    Response to Twentysecond Century..By: Guruji | 06-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Twentysecond Century.. what brilliant idea dude! It is going to cost a fortune but I am sure it is worth it. The whole system that you have suggested can even be developed as a package and sold to other nations. There is not doubt such a a system will be appreciated by any democratic country in the world. I fully agree with your suggestions as much as I disagree with the words of Mr. Advani who wants, as in everything, to move one step backward and re-introduce the ballot paper mechanism (so that his pet thugs can have a good time subverting the democratic system in the name of Hinduism).
    EVM - BJPBy: Neduncheziyan | 06-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward If BJP and Comunists won this election, there is no problem for EVM but they failed, there is problem in the EVM. They are taking like school children. Even Weak no no strong Advaniji and Gunda no no saint Modiji own their seats EVM working very very good and loosing election, the same EVM working very very bad. Once the vicket fax say the grapes are not good because its too high.
    Pakistan ki aulaad Bharat ko bhi banaega Swatwala Pakistan.By: DR.STRIPPED CHOR | 06-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Sanghi and al-qaida like talibans are liars they are stripped searched when so ever they visit any foreign country no one has any kind of trust in them. Even the liar Advani and his coffin-in-law George Fernandes get stripped searched on their trips abroad. How could we the people of this country inject these sorts of petrol pump liars to represent us Hindus in our parliament, because they cannot even represent themselves.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.