Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Backward March

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Last week’s Budget brought home to me a sad reality. It was not the Marxist parties who prevented economic reforms from going forward during Dr Manmohan Singh’s last government, it was the Congress Party. This is not just disappointing but scary because now it is certain that India will remain a wretchedly poor, hopelessly backward country well into the middle of this century. We have to alter course if this is not to be the case and the Finance Minister made it clear that not only does he have no intention of altering course but as an admirer of Indira Gandhi’s ‘visionary’ economic policies, he plans to emulate them.

    So instead of policies that will create wealth we will return to spending huge amounts of our scarce resources on keeping the poor in poverty. It is my view that the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA) will serve mostly to keep millions of very poor Indians in perpetual poverty because a hundred days of employment a year can do no more than that. It is my view that the Congress Party did not win 200 seats in the last election because of guaranteeing rural employment but because the average voter was scared of seeing some Mayawati type politician as Prime Minister. Or some aged Hindutva warrior. By comparison, Dr Manmohan Singh and the possibility of Rahul Gandhi as his heir seemed like a better choice. But, halfway through the first hundred days of this government and it is beginning to seem like a return to our bad old socialist days.

    ... contd.

    Next123
    GaribiBy: M Thacker | 17-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward There cannot be Slogan Garibi Hatao without Garibi.Congress since days of Jawaherlal Nehru who became Prime Minister although he had no support a single PCC knows this.Hence poverty is necessary so the Rulers can live in Sultanlike life style.
    BackwardBudgetBy: Ajay | 13-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Mrs Singh perhaps does not know one foundamental fact relating to a Third World democracy. That it is easier to rule illeterate and half educated, mal-nourished, mostly ill people than to rule educated, nourished and healthy lots. India is a country of "Jogaad" and "Sab chalta hai". Out of metros, majority of Indians live in 19th. century. Just travel to UP, Bihar and north east states. I agree that Congres got 200 Lok Sabha seats by default, that the average Indians were scared of Mayavati, Advani, Laaloo, Mulayam and the likes becoming Prime Minister. Sad fact is, majority of Indians are condemned to remain poor for few more generations. Unless the mind set of the ruling class change, expect nothing.
    cont...By: naveen | 13-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Reliance Power, for instance, how horribly it could provide so called efficent services in flood infested Mumbai, when it was caught with its pants down in recent floods. Upon investigation , it was found that Sarkari Powerllines were back to normal much earlier that Reliance Boxes , because the "efficient" Managers at reliance were keeping Minimum capital invested in keeping the lines going. So , needless to say, When Floods wreaked the entire city, Reliance was badly equiped to put it back on track. This led to large protests against Reliance in mumbai.
    naveBy: Naveen | 13-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward miss Tavleen's views are, for most part, terribly rightist and there is a certain lack of understanding on her part of the entire dynamics of this great nation of ours.India's 70% population lives in its 6 Lac or so villages, and it is of certain consequence to them if NREGA or other flagship schemes of UPA are continued. The Urban , well educated masses and the Junkie cum hippe NRI classess with unlimited Bandwidth that infest the Internet sewers(also posting , in due process all these comments above )wouldnt probably understand a dime about the ground situation in india.As for Tavleen argument about poor being kept poor goes, it surely does have some merit, but i must say it has been carried too far by her.India does need its rather pedestrian primary schools , it does need its lethary stricken municipalities, the fire services and the police and numerous other services that NO private player would rather enter.we already are in midst of deep hole carved out my greedy capitalis
    Grand old days of wasteful, populist policies are backBy: jatin | 12-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Once upon a time our present finance minister, Pranab Mukherjee was declared among the “top four in the world” during Indira Gandhi’s era. In India, any person can become “great” if he has proper connections with media and more importantly with political and industrial circle. Manmoan Singh was the architect of many populist policies during past Congress rules. He either did not oppose (which is most likely- considering the situation to “succeed” in India) or his opposition was not heard. He became very famous when India had no other option but to open up its economy due to almost bankruptcy situation for too many huge populist and wasteful economic policies. It’s like Another Singh, Santa Singh, asking “who pushed me into water” while being praised for rescuing a drowning person. With few billion dollars as reserve, we are back to our grand old days of wasteful, populist policies which will make sure the poverty sustains and so does the politics associated with that.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.