Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Balochistan on the boil

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  •  

    Man of the moment

    The Nizam-e-Adl Regulation is not a new concept in Pakistan, and it is not the first time it has been proposed for the Pakhtoon belt. The first leader to propose it was none other than the liberal secular Benazir Bhutto. The then right-wing Nawaz Sharif followed suit in suggesting the same solution for the beleaguered people of NWFP. Time has come full circle for the PPP as they have proposed it once again in Swat this time, but Sharif’s vociferous condemnation of the idea he once nurtured comes as a surprise. He not only lambasted the government for going ahead with a seemingly retrograde formula for peace but also suggested an alternative route to reach their destination. Daily Times on April 22 carried an interview the former PM gave to USA Today in which he feared the Taliban were imposing “their version of Shariah”. The interview stated: “They are now threatening to take other areas. We’ve got to avoid that situation.” He supported dialogue with “relatively moderate Islamist groups.” The remedy to the lawlessness in the area, he said, was “sufficient economic development.” The News on April 23 hailed Sharif in a congratulatory editorial: “The disquiet expressed by Nawaz Sharif over aspects of the Swat peace deal marks a significant break with his past public posture on the Taliban and offers a glimmer of hope for those seeking a united front to tackle the growing threat of militancy. The former PM was more critical than normal of the Taliban. He stated unequivocally any deal with the militants must not allow democracy to be derailed or the writ of the government to be challenged. This marks an important shift for a leader who has long been accused of being soft on the Taliban and displaying an unacceptable degree of ambivalence in his public stance on the threat the militants pose.” 

    Ads by Google

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext123
    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.