Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Batla encounter: Apex court says no to plea for judicial probe

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Courts

    The Supreme Court refused to entertain a petition seeking a judicial probe into the controversial Batla House encounter on Friday, observing that any such direction “will adversely affect the morale of the police”.

    In response to the petition by the non-governmental organisation, Act Now For Harmony and Democracy, the Bench headed by Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan took strong exception to the argument that the encounter of September 18, 2008, shook the faith and confidence of a particular community.

    “This is the problem,” the Court said, “you must not identify any section of the society. Criminals are criminals, why do you identify a community (with it)?”

    The Bench, also comprising Justices P Sathasivam and B S Chauhan, refused to entertain the plea for an independent inquiry as well. “Thousands of police officers are being killed by criminals and terrorists,” the Bench said. “It will adversely affect the morale of the police.”

    Ads by Google

    Representing the NGO, advocate Prashant Bhushan had appealed against the Delhi High Court's clean chit to the Delhi Police. The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), too, had refused to order an independent judicial inquiry.

    The Court said acceding to the plea and ordering such an inquiry will also lead to embarrassment. “It is all so unfortunate that people including a police officer were killed. But anything can happen in the encounter,” the Court said to Bhushan's submission that it was impossible to have four bullet holes on the forehead of one of the suspected militants.

    In its petition, the NGO had alleged that the NHRC probe was based only on the police version and as such, cannot be said to have been conducted on expected lines.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Batla House EncounterBy: M. H. Rahman | 31-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward Finding out the truth is the main point. Demoralization takes place when truth is suppressed. Punishment of the guilty is the objective of the rule of law which is blind to who is guilty. Justice and fairplay can only make the nation happy and strong.
    this can happen only in IndiaBy: Mayank | 31-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward Have some shame guys. You have the audacity to blatantly question the genuineness of the encounter even after our Police lost one of its most brave officers. Its only a country like India that gives freedom to crooks like you all to go on with your rhetoric against your own country. Its very true DONT MIX RELIGION WITH CRIMINALS. Iam as much against people from SIMI as people like Swamni Pragya and Co (Malegaon). They are all criminals. Indian Muslims have to stop some of their fellow brothers who love to portray this fear hysteria to the outside world. How come all the blasts that had become a weekend affair all across the country prior to the Batla encounter (Ahemdabad, Delhi twice, Bangalore) came to a stop immediately after that?? DONT TRY TO GET A BHAGWAN OR A ALLAH INTO EVERYTHING.
    Stop this nonsenseBy: chanakya | 31-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward It is the height of pervertedness. Just because Supreme court said no to probe is it fair to write such stuff. If at all the majority was against the minoroties, situation would have been different. We would have been like another pakistan and Srilanka. It is the handful of perverted mentally sick idle mongers who create all this mess.It appears that some minds can never see reason and always would like to be in a position of eternal self denial. Only time will tell how fortunate are the familiess who decided to stay back and didn't opt to migrate to newly created religion based countries. There has to be an end to this sort of provocative write ups and publicity.
    Batala CseBy: MOHAN DADDIKAR | 31-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward This clearly shows that even the Supreme Court is communal and is against the Muslims, a harassed minority in India. I expect Shabana Azmi and Seesma Setalwad, the champions of Muslims to take the matter to UNO and get the judges dismessed from service.
    "Protection of Police Morality" ...????????????????By: Naim Naqvi | 31-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward For an ordinary Muslim who lives in perpetual fear for security and discrimination, a judicial inquiry could have been reassuring and this argument is based on the singularity and uniqueness of this BATLA ENCOUNTER.No one saw cross firing in the neighborhood. Only the police claim it happened. The whole country is aware of the trustworthiness of our police. How come the two so-called terrorists managed to flee while there was only one exit. If they knew they were going for a possible encounter, why wasn’t the building or the area properly covered by the police? India’s 160 million Muslims have a problem: fear. And nobody is willing to even listen to them. They are the in-betweens of India’s fight against terrorism. They want to be part of the solution and not part of the problem. According to the Bench “It will adversely affect the morale of the police". I would say moral of 160 million human beings is also important. A proper inquiry could have resolved a lot of uncertainities.
    Batala encounterBy: MOHAN DADDIKAR | 31-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward Naim Naqvi should not all hopes aout impartiality of the Supreme Court becasue if this encounter had taken place in any BJP-ruled state, the decision of the case would have been definetly in favour of Muslims.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.