Premium
This is an archive article published on August 25, 2011

Be more aggressive,Yashwant tells party

As the Lokpal issue gripped the polity,the BJP leadership came under pressure from within to take a more strident stand on the Bill in favour of Anna Hazare.

As the Lokpal issue gripped the polity,the BJP leadership on Wednesday came under pressure from within to take a more strident stand on the Bill in favour of Anna Hazare and be more aggressive against the UPA government on the corruption plank. The voices of dissent came to the fore at the party’s parliamentary party meeting,with senior leader Yashwant Sinha leading the charge.

Sinha,sources said,told the meeting that he agreed with L K Advani’s view that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh should step down and go for fresh elections. He expressed willingness to even resign from the Lok Sabha and wage the battle. Further,he is said to have argued that the party’s stand on the Lokpal Bill was unclear,which is hampering its fight against corruption and the UPA.

Sinha wanted the BJP to come openly in support of Hazare and all those who are fighting against corruption.

Story continues below this ad

Adding to this was Varun Gandhi’s appearance at Ramlila Maidan where he said “we should support Anna Hazare’s movement because it is this agitation which will shape the country’s future.”

Under pressure,the party,which initially expressed strong reservations about the government’s Lokpal Bill and resolved to seek amendments in the Standing Committee,has now changed its stance and has demanded its total withdrawal.

While party MPs Shatrughan Sinha and Uday Singh endorsed Sinha’s views,several others including Hukumdev Narayan Yadav felt too much is being made out of the Hazare stir.

The BJP re-caliberated its position after it felt Hazare’s campaign is getting huge support from the middle-class – the party’s mainstay – and has caught the imagination of a considerable section of the population. Many of the MPs have been saying in private that the party has ceded the opposition space to civil society groups and was not gaining much from playing the role of a spectator.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement