Amba Salelkar

For all our children


Amba Salelkar

Before he skipped Cabinet, Pawar isolated on food Bill

Ads by Google
FP

A day before Agriculture Minister Sharad Pawar skipped a Cabinet meeting to register his protest against the Congress ignoring the NCP's views in policy matters, he had found himself waging a lone battle against a revised proposal of the national food security Bill.

The new proposal seeks to have a blanket provision to provide 25 kg highly subsidised foodgrain to a family of five per month, covering 67 per cent of the population. Pawar was the lone voice to argue that not only was this bad economics, but regressive as well as it did not entail concomitant investment in farm infrastructure.

The new proposal seeks to meet the suggestions by some current and a few former members of the National Advisory Council headed by Congress chief Sonia Gandhi.

Pawar, who had flagged off his reservations over the food guarantee law in a letter to PM Manmohan Singh in July last year, reiterated the same at the high-level meeting of the Cabinet that was attended by Defence Minister A K Antony, Home Minister P Chidambaram and Food Minister K V Thomas.

Pawar talked about the sustainability of the subsidy burden as well as the legally binding requirement of annual procurement of over 62 million tonnes, and its adverse impact on the domestic grain market. The legally binding annual food subsidy burden would be over Rs 1.18 lakh crore.

Thomas, however, was learnt to have brushed aside his concerns, instead saying that the revisions needed to procure over 62 million tonnes of annual foodgrain could be pushed through. "Then we do not even need a PDS," Thomas retorted at one point, sources said.

Pawar reportedly did not find any help from the politicians present either. Chidambaram raised the government's political commitment to enact a food guarantee law, while Antony backed the revisions proposed by Thomas.

... contd.

Ads by Google
Please read our terms of use before posting comments
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
comments powered by Disqus