Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Behind Lalu’s ‘surplus’ claim: A shift in accounting policy

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India hasn’t agreed to this change. In its 2005-06 report, its latest, CAG said, “The charging of the capital component to revenue was not in order.” Further, CAG noted, “Railways needed to appropriate funds to the Capital Fund, from which the capital portion of the lease charges are finally paid, from the surplus available with them.” According to the report, the Railways is now considering doing that.

    Interest on IR fund balances (Rs 660.85 crore): The Finance Ministry pays interest on the closing balance of various IR funds (Depreciation Reserve Fund, Pension Fund, Development Fund and Capital Fund). Earlier, this interest was adjusted to IR funds through the year-end proforma adjustment with the Finance Ministry.

    From 2006-07, IR decided to first credit the interest income accruing on its fund balances to ‘miscellaneous receipts’ and subsequently debit an equal amount to the same funds. CAG hasn’t agreed to this change either. “If the interest amount is received under miscellaneous receipts, the surplus would be enhanced artificially,” says a CAG letter to IR.

    Ads by Google

    Losses on strategic lines (Rs 309 crore): The Centre compensates IR for the losses it incurs on strategic lines. Previously, IR used to deduct the compensatory grant from the annual dividend payable by it to the government. However, from 2006-07, IR decided to deduct the compensatory grant from its working expenditure, saying that “the reimbursement of losses should rightly go for reducing the excess expenditure”.

    Simultaneously, it didn’t make any deductions from the dividend payable. The Railway Convention Committee, in its latest report, has recommended that IR get CAG’s views; CAG is yet to approve this change.

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext123
    even superfast trains' claim is falseBy: kalpana chauha | 12-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Perhaps Indian express should also fill and RTI application to find out how much railways gained by changing the name(only name) of some trains to superfast/express thereby charging additional superfast charges on each ticket.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.