Black Buck case, SC rejects Rajasthan's plea against Salman Khan
Related
Top Stories
- Former Ranji player held, Sreesanth and others to be produced in court today
- India, China have wisdom to address bounday issue: Li Keqiang
- All eyes on Narendra Modi as BJP set to discuss strategy for Lok Sabha polls
- In 7 lucrative minutes on May 9, Sreesanth bowled 6 balls, bookie made Rs 2.5 cr
- SC agrees to hear PIL to stay IPL matches due to spot-fixing

In a partial relief to Bollywood star Salman Khan and four other actors, the Supreme Court today refused to entertain a plea of Rajasthan government seeking to re-invoke the charge of rioting against them in the 15-year-old black buck killing case.
"The charge under the Wildlife Protection Act has been retained against all the five accused. The Sessions judge discharged them of charge under sections 146 (rioting) and 147 (punishment for rioting) (under the IPC) and the Revision court (HC) also upheld it," a bench of justices P Sathasivam, J S Khehar and Vikramajit Sen said.
It did not allow the plea of Rajasthan government challenging the dropping of rioting charges against Salman, Saif Ali Khan, Tabbu, Neelam and Sonali Bendre.
During the hearing, the counsel for the state government said that the charge has wrongly been dropped against them as the said provision talked about the violence which can be used against anything such as property and animal. The violence should not necessarily be undertaken against human beings.
Earlier, the Rajasthan High Court had revised the charges framed against Khan and the ther Bollywood celebrities and paved way for their trial in the case.
The High Court had said that Khan would be charged under Section 51 of Wildlife Act and Section 149 of the IPC (Unlawful assembly).
Section 51 of Wildlife Act entails jail sentence up to three years or fine or both.
The actors have been accused of poaching two Black Bucks in the intervening night of 1-2 October, 1998 in Kankani village near Jodhpur during the shooting of Bollywood flick 'Hum Saath Saath Hain'.
Other actors have been booked under section 52 (attempts to contravene, or abet the contravention of, any of the provisions) of Wildlife Act and section 149 of the IPC. against others.
The state government had moved the High Court in 2006 against dropping of some charges against Salman and others.
... contd.
Editors’ Pick
- 'Sophisticated' Indian cyberattacks targeted Pak military sites: Report
- Talkative Li quoted Weber, Hegel, Jobs, said PM is large-hearted
- Bihar food corp ends up with chaff as rice worth Rs 535 cr vanishes from mills
- In 7 lucrative minutes on May 9, Sreesanth bowled 6 balls, bookie made Rs 2.5 cr
- India and China ask border envoys to work on more steps
- Former Ranji player among 3 more held
- Rajasthan Royals to file FIR against tainted trio
- Family of theft accused allege police torture
- IVF breakthrough can triple number of births: Scientists
- After Khalid’s death, Muslim leaders want govt to make Nimesh panel report public
- Meteoroid impact triggers bright flash on the moon
- Cobrapost sting: NABARD chief gives clean chit to co-operative banks


Nikhil Advani can't wait to watch Go Goa Gone
Lara Dutta calls her daughter Saira the 'boss'
Kim Kardashian's baby to be part of her reality show
'Sex and the City 3' would be wonderful: Sarah Jessica Parker


















