You are here: IE »   Story

Black money, Maoist threat impede electoral process: EC

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • S Y Quraishi
    'In the 30 days' of the election process we cannot contain black money.'
    Discount UK Shopping

    Role of black money in elections, threat to voters from Maoists, mushroom growth of political parties and casual approach of urban voters impede the electoral process in the country, Election Commissioner S Y Quraishi has said.

    "Role of black money is the biggest problem. We admit that we have failed to curb it. In the 30 days' of the election process we cannot contain black money," he said last night at a seminar on 'Indian Elections 2009 - Trends and Perspectives'.

    Quraishi also spoke of the fire power of the Maoists, deterring voters from exercising their franchise.

    He expressed concern over mushroom growth of political parties in the country and pointed out that at present there were some 1,200 small parties. "Some of these even run from betel shops," he said in a lighter vein.

    Quraishi said the causal approach of urban voters towards elections was "a dangerous trend". "Voters do not have the right to criticise a government if they do not play a part in its formation", he said.

    Ads by Google

    He expressed satisfaction over less violence during the recent Lok Sabha polls and said booth capturing has become a thing of the past, thanks to the strict measures adopted by the Commission.

    ElectionBy: Damodar P.Shetty | 07-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Black money and maoist are the problems but selection of candidates is within your power, if you wish so. Why do you allow unscrupulous candidates with criminal background to contest the election? People sentensed to life are also allowed to contest. Is it democracy? That is the reason why urban voters are not interested in this drama. When these people enter the Parliament, you know the situation they are creating there. But everything goes unnoticed, except that !urban voters are not interested!. Correct the procedure, accept candidates with clean record and then see the result.
    Big FarceBy: Rohit | 06-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Give the voter right to reject and then we will see where you stand Quraishi. Every citizen of India whether he votes or not has the right to question, criticize government. Your bread and butter is provided by citizens of the country. India and it's citizens can do extremely well without politicians but not other way round.
    Out of the many possible ways out, here is one..By: CK Raju, Thrissur | 05-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Political parties mushroom only when they are convinced that democratic spirit is not to be found in the earlier parties. When such people think forming another party is a solution, they too subsequently fall in the same trap. The solution to democracy cannot be found with the help of a representative system, where the representatives or their parties would always argue in favour of the system where they can exist as intermediaries. Wherever citizens overthrow existing representing-political-party by a huge margin - the period for governance should be reduced by one or two years - because the people's will indicates that they lost faith in this setup pretty long back. If the existing representing party is re-instated - the duration can be increased. When the shrinking duration falls below 1 year, EC should come to conclusion that representative system has come to a standstill and is non-functional. EC should, then, recommend direct-democracy in such regions.
    How to end mushroom growth of political parties?By: SC Aggarwal | 04-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward It is election Commission who is responsible forthe mushroom growth of political parties - at present said to be 1200. Why does the Election Commission recognise a political party which came into existence just about two months ago before declaration of elections by the Commission? I have a few suggestions for the consideration of the Election Commission.First, political parties which have come into existence just six months before the date of declaration of elections should not be recognised as Political Party to fight election. Secondly, every political party should be asked to declare the name of the would be Finance Minister of his party and a blueprint of schemes and programmes to be launched to remove poverty from the country.Third, Every political party (1200 at present) to name the would be Prime Minister, Finance Minister, External Minister, Home Minister - names of would be team of ministers. A few more can also be suggested.
    I Must ChangeBy: Jesudas Medidi | 04-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward I must change as a responsible citizen, I must change as a responsible police personnel, I must change as a responsible politician, I must change as a responsible officer, I should give bribe, I should not take bribe, for all things happening around me is because of me only. I SHOULD CHANGE, for a better INDIA
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.