Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Bollywood or Mollywood?

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • When I feel down and depressed, I turn to some book of poetry or philosophy to find solace and strength. And right now, I am feeling depressed, also sad and angry. Reason: the news that Raj Thackeray’s Maharashtra Navanirman Sena (MNS) has forced Karan Johar, a well-known Bollywood filmmaker, to apologise for having referred to Mumbai as ‘Bombay’ in his new film Wake Up Sid. MNS claims that the maker of many Bollywood hits “hurt the sentiments of Maharashtrians” by doing so.

    I am no admirer of Johar. But as a proud Maharashtrian, and one who has profound love and admiration for Marathi, I asked myself: Did Johar commit a crime by calling this city ‘Bombay’? Does one show disrespect to Mumbai, to Marathi or to Maharashtrians by referring to this city as ‘Bombay’, a name that many Mumbaikars, including me, are still fond of? In any case, who has authorised MNS to threaten people and secure apology from them on the pain of inviting violent action?

    Ads by Google

    I pick up a slim book from my shelf—Rabindranath Tagore’s Faith of A Poet. The publisher’s name is given as “Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, Bombay-400 007”. Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, like Bollywood, is one of the many great institutions this city gave birth to when it was ‘Bombay’. (I wonder how many great institutions the proponents of Mumbai have built after changing the city’s name.) Its founder was Dr. K.M. Munshi, an eminent freedom fighter and littérateur in Gujarati who had made Bombay his home. Munshi himself was a devoted follower of another great Gujarati, who lived more years of his action-filled life in Bombay than in any other city in India—Mahatma Gandhi.

    ... contd.

    Next1234
    Sudheendra's new mentor is a champion of name changing!By: Roy | 05-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward Dear Mr Kulkarni, I hope you will advise your new mentor Mamata Banerjee and the Railways ministry to reverse her name changing spree in Kolkata metro stations (not very different from what Raj Thackeray is doing)! Otherwise we all will feel very very depressed.
    All tanashahi.....By: jyotsana singh | 05-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward somebody above rightly said that it does not have any thing to do with patriotism or hurting somebodied feeling...it just they want to prove that Maharashtra is their property... this ways they are creating more disrespect for themselves. M a big fan of karan johar but here it has nothing to do with being fan or not. it's democratic country and we have right of freedom of expression ...this is sick...
    Thackeray or Thakre??By: Pradeep | 05-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward Rightly said, Dr. Kumar. If Raj Thackeray despises anglicised names so much, first he should rename his surname back to Thakre, which was changed by his grandfather because he was a fan of famous novelist of his time - William Makepeace Thackeray.
    Call what you mayBy: Dr. A. Kumar, England | 05-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward Thanks Raj for hastening break up of India. Incidently, it is not his initiation but the entire political class. In the name of reseration, vote bank, caste, religion, region and sundries, they have put Indians at each other throat. In its entire history, India has rarely been a unified country, both politically and geographically. That is one reason why inhabitants mostly identify themseles as anything but Indian. It is an artificial country. How else one explain insurgency in North East, Kashmir, Naxalites menace? What unites Indians is Cricket, Ramayan and Mahabharat. Eeven Sino-Indian war of 1962 exposed many fifth column. Instead of creating another Bombay, Calcutta, Madras and Banglore, Indians just changed their names pretending that they are the creators. In African countries, no names have been changed. Changing name is like re-writing history. And honestly speaking, these Thackrays should also change their surname which is an English surname and start using a Marathi one.
    History unwritten!By: R. Kapoor | 04-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward How about rewriting the song: Yeh hei Bombay, Yeh hei Bombay meri jaan. How about the Bombay Stock Exchange, or Bombay High Court? Why have so much attachment to a name, as a rose by any name smell as good, said William Shakespeare. BTW the same applies to Madras High Court.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.