Bombay High Court upholds life sentence for mother who killed child
Related
Top Stories
- Rs 20L seized from Ajit Chandila relative's home, another ex-cricketer held
- India and China ask SRs to work on more border steps
- Can't charge man with rape over consensual sex even if marriage eludes: Supreme Court
- Saudi Arabian authorities refuse to accept new Indian passports
- FIR filed against Facebook for not discontinuing hate page
The Bombay High Court has upheld the life imprisonment imposed by a lower court on a young woman who jumped from the terrace of her house along with her 15-day old baby with a view to kill the child and commit suicide.
However, finding the infant still alive, the mother stabbed the infant with a kitchen knife as a result of which the baby's intestinal coils protruded out and it eventually died.
The judgement was delivered recently by justices Sadhana Jadhav and V K Tahilramani, who rejected the appeal filed by 21-year-old Savita Bhosale, a resident of Pune, currently lodged in Yerwada prison.
"Looking at the evidence on record, we find there is sufficient material to connect the appellant with the crime. Hence, there is no merit in the appeal," the judges observed.
The Court rejected the defence argument that the husband of the appellant had murdered the child and falsely implicated her in the murder. The judges referred to the evidence which said that the appellant was sleeping with her baby on a cot and her mother was also sleeping nearby.
"In such case, it would be highly impossible that the husband of the appellant would drag his wife with the baby to the terrace and then throw the appellant and the child down."
"If that was done, then the appellant would have certainly put up resistance and raised a hue and cry, due to which her mother could have awakened and rushed to her help. However, the mother of the appellant does not state any such fact," the court noted.
"Also, in case the husband had dragged the appellant and the baby to the terrace and pushed them down and later stabbed the baby, the mother of the appellant would havestated sobefore the court. On the other hand, the mother of the appellant has turned hostile. We find no merit in this submission," the judges opined. The Court rejected another argument of defence lawyer that the baby accidentally fell down from terrace and fell on the grill and sustained injuries. "If this defence is to bebelieved, then blood would be seen on the grill, but no blood stains were found on the grill," the judges said.
... contd.
Editors’ Pick
- Former Ranji player among 3 more held
- Rajasthan Royals to file FIR against tainted trio
- If found guilty, BCCI to ask ICC to erase Sreesanth records
- Top cops among 42 named in death of blast accused
- Manmohan-Li talks: PM takes tough line on incursion issue
- Security forces blame Maoists, villagers say CoBRA man was killed in 'friendly fire'
- Travellers’ nightmare: Yellow fever vaccine stocks run out, production unit awaits repair
- Family of theft accused allege police torture
- IVF breakthrough can triple number of births: Scientists
- After Khalid’s death, Muslim leaders want govt to make Nimesh panel report public
- Meteoroid impact triggers bright flash on the moon
- Cobrapost sting: NABARD chief gives clean chit to co-operative banks


Sikhs protest near Parliament House against acquittal of Sajjan Kumar in riots case
A K Antony to commission MiG-29 K fighter planes into Navy
Parliament adjourned till noon amid uproar
Strike disrupts normal life in Kashmir Valley




















