You are here: IE »   Story

Breach of privilege: Pranab to address both Houses

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Pranab mukherjee
    Pranab Mukherjee will make a statement in Parliament on India’s civilian N-agreements with US and France.
    Discount UK Shopping

    To Blunt the Left’s charge of “breach of privilege” by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, the UPA Government will on Monday field External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee to make a statement in Parliament on India’s civilian nuclear cooperation agreements with US and France, official sources told 'The Indian Express' on Sunday.

    Sources said Mukherjee’s statement, expected to be made at noon, will be an attempt to set the record straight that the Government has not committed any breach of privilege. Left parties are expected to raise the issue of “breach of privilege” by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, as they have already moved separate privilege motions in both the Houses. Left MPs had already forced an adjournment last Friday.

    An official source said the statement, which will be made by the External Affairs Minister in both Houses of the Parliament, will be consistent with the Prime Minister’s commitment on July 22 when he had said that he would come back to the Parliament before “operationalising” the agreement.

    Ads by Google

    The UPA Government, through this detailed statement, will look to dispel concerns that continue to be voiced even after India obtained a clean NSG waiver and signed framework agreements with US and France.

    The statement will provide details of the developments on the nuclear front since it won the trust vote on July 22.

    Sources said Mukherjee’s statement will refer to President George W Bush’s presidential statement on October 8, as he signed the 123 Agreement into a law. This statement, sources said, is significant since Bush, while signing the agreement into a law, had responded to the two key concerns of the Indian side: the fuel supply assurances and reprocessing rights.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    123By: yohan | 20-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward how a 'speech' made outside the written 123 deal will be a commitment by the US needs to be explained by the govt. If a speech is a commitment, there is no need for separate deal. Bush can make a speech and Dr Singh can make another speech. common notion is that whatever is in writing will be enforceable clauses. Hence govt's attempt to say that Bush made a speech where he made commitment to uninterrupted supply is farce. Be realistic and pragmatic.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.