Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

BRICs and G-2

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • All the soaring rhetoric from Yekaterinburg on the solidarity of the second tier powers against Anglo-Saxon hegemony can’t hide one simple reality — that China is a cut above the rest of the BRICs.Unpack the impressive combined statistics of the BRICs and you will find an unmistakable hierarchy. Russia is a declining power and is on the way down. India and Brazil are on the way up, but have a long way to go. Among the BRICs, China is the number one.

    When you are on top of a heap, you get a better perspective than when you are at its bottom. That is what probably separates China and India at this week’s talk-fest in Yekaterinburg. India has gone to Yekaterinburg because of its abiding sense of obligation to Russia. The Chinese, in contrast, are in the Urals to enjoy a free political ride. China has two reasons to encourage Russia’s anti-Western bravado. If someone has to bash the Americans, why not get the Russians to do it? The harder the Russians go at America, Beijing knows, the greater its own leverage with Washington.

    Ads by Google

    This, indeed, is an old story. Russia’s confrontation with the West helped China get better terms from the British imperialists in the nineteenth century and the hegemonic Americans in the twentieth. The twenty-first century, however, is different with China ranked higher than Russia. The Obama administration has confirmed the new global pecking order when it declared that managing its bilateral relationship with China is the most important foreign policy priority. The idea of ‘Group of Two’ — America and China — jointly managing the world has steadily gained ground since Barack Obama took charge of Washington.

    ... contd.

    Next123
    Destined to be second rateBy: Mark | 19-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward India should ally itself with other middle powers to safeguard itself. One knows that US, China and Russia will never give India a permanent seat in the UNSC as they not want to build up a threat in the future less from a second rate power.
    Look who is talkingBy: Sanjeev | 17-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward How is India a traitor to US.US was always against India,and supported Pakistan even after the Cold War.US cannot be trusted.Look what they did to Saddam after supporting him initially,and they were the ones who supported the Taliban against the Soviets.You see my friend,USA IS THE BACKSTABBING TRAITOR. It is your perspective that the Mumbai attacks were funny,but I still believe that 9/11 was tragic and NOT funny.
    US and India By: Sankar | 30-Sep-2009 Reply | Forward Saddam , Taliban , ... Just goes to show that US is a vibrant democracy as India . Successive US Govt.’s set US national strategy. The rogue regimes you mention gained clandestine support when the CIA needed them , but not legitimacy . The same CIA worked against them, when these regimes turned against US govt. . The US is India’s natural ally, but some times our interest differs. So does EU and the best ally of US , including Israel. In the last decade India and US relations seem to have matured enough to recognize these and to work together. To say the US is against India always, shows ignorance.
    I'm done with you and will urge American politicians to do the sameBy: Robert | 17-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward As an American, after today I now consider India a backstabbing traitor.I hope Pakistan nukes your country. GO PAKISTAN!The attacks on India last year were funny!
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.