Renuka Sane

Retiring unhurt


Renuka Sane

Cabinet clears SC, ST quota in promotions, Bill in RS today

Ads by Google
FP

Ignoring the opinions of its senior-most law officers, the Union Cabinet today approved removal of one of the three pre-conditions set by the Supreme Court allowing quota for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in promotions only if there is empirical evidence to support it.

The UPA Cabinet approved amendments to Article 16(4) of the Constitution that will allow states to reserve seats in promotion for SCs, STs without collecting "data to show the backwardness of class and the inadequacy of that class in public appointments".

The amendment Bill is expected to be moved in the Rajya Sabha tomorrow.

"Notwithstanding anything mentioned elsewhere in the Constitution, the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes notified under Article 341 and 342 respectively shall be deemed to be backward and nothing in this article or Article 335 shall prevent the state from making any provision for reservation in matters of promotion... in favour of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes," says the amendment.

A Constitution bench of the Supreme Court had earlier held that states could provide reservation only if "compelling reasons" existed. "It's only when these reasons are satisfied that a state gets power to provide for reservation in matters of employment," it had said.

The reasons cited by the Department of Personnel & Training (DoPT) for amending the article with retrospective effect from June 17, 1995 was that there was "difficulty in collection of the data" as well as "uncertainty on the methodology of this exercise". "This will infuse greater confidence in the minds of SCs and STs," it said.

At the Cabinet meeting today, there was no alternate view expressed on the amendment Bill. Barring the Samajwadi Party (SP), all the other parties too had supported the move at an all-party meeting called by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh on August 21.

However, two days later, on August 23, Attorney General G E Vahanvati had cautioned that the court's view in M Nagaraj Vs Union of India case "not only relates to the basic structures of the Constitution but also the fundamentals of equality".

... contd.

Ads by Google
Please read our terms of use before posting comments
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
comments powered by Disqus