Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

CBI fields senior lawyer in appeal against Sajjan

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • On November 1, 1984, one Naveen Singh, a resident of Sultanpuri area here, was murdered by a mob, allegedly instigated by Kumar.

    Special judge Manju Goel had in 2002 acquitted Kumar, MLA Jai Kishan and six others on “benefit of doubt”, 12 years after the investigative agency registered the case in August 1990.

    Subsequently, a Delhi High Court bench led by Justice Manmohan Sarin had admitted the appeal earlier this month to be heard on a day-to-day basis, four years after the CBI filed it in the year 2003.

    However, allegations arose against the CBI’s choice of lawyer, Wadia, from various quarters, including the riot victims to higher-ups in Shiromani Akali Dal like its president and CM of Punjab, Parkash Singh Badal, and Shiromani Gurudwara Prabhandhar Committee Amritsar chief Aftar Singh Makkar. Responding to the allegations, Wadia said he was an “Additional Legal Advisor and Special Public Prosecutor” with the probe agency and had been registered as an advocate since 1971. Stressing that “he had no special interest in the case”, Wadia said. “I am here on the directions of the CBI Director and am willing to relieve myself of the responsibility if given the orders to do so,” he had said.

    Ads by Google

    Previous12
    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.