CBI filed separate chargesheets for sinister purpose: Shah to SC
Related
Top Stories
- Former Ranji player held, Sreesanth and others to be produced in court today
- Li Keqiang pitches for more Chinese investments as he backs trade balance
- All eyes on Narendra Modi as BJP set to discuss strategy for Lok Sabha polls
- SC agrees to hear PIL to stay IPL matches due to spot-fixing
- Monstrous tornado rips through US city of Oklahoma, 90 dead

Former Gujarat minister Amit Shah on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that the CBI, with "sinister design" and "malafide," has filed separate chargesheets in the Sohrabuddin Sheikh and Tulsiram Prajapati fake encounter cases since they sought his arrest and police custody yet again.
"The CBI had secured investigation in the Prajapati case only in order to explore a larger conspiracy in the Sohrabuddin case. They also said it in their affidavits and on oath that Prajapati's killing was inter-connected and integral part of the conspiracy hatched as a part of the same transaction. However, they lodged separate FIRs. CBI's inconsistent stand is only to get the petitioner's custody separately in the cases," Shah's counsel Mahesh Jethmalani submitted before a Bench led by Justice P Sathasivam.
"The CBI's stand is a malafide design to seek police custody of Shah a second time. That is the whole purpose of taking two stands. Filing of separate chargesheets, which they have admitted to be part of the same transaction, leads to abuse of the process of law," he said.
Referring to certain previous orders of the apex court, Jethmalani contended that even the court had recorded the two killings as one series of acts and what has been conducted by the CBI is "further investigation" and "not fresh investigation".
"CBI's endevaour is to keep the petitioner in custody and that is the whole purpose of taking two stands. There is a sinister purpose behind two FIRs and two chargesheets. The High Court has granted me bail in the Sohrabuddin Sheikh and Supreme Court did not interfere with it. They now want to circumvent this bail order and make sure that I approach court again to plead afresh for bail in the other case too," he argued.
Jethmalani said the CBI had maintained in the chargesheet and status report of probe in the Sohrabuddin case that Prajapati was gunned down because he was the eyewitness in the case of killing of Sohrabuddin and his wife Kauser Bi in November 2005.
... contd.
Editors’ Pick
- 'Sophisticated' Indian cyberattacks targeted Pak military sites: Report
- Talkative Li quoted Weber, Hegel, Jobs, said PM is large-hearted
- Bihar food corp ends up with chaff as rice worth Rs 535 cr vanishes from mills
- In 7 lucrative minutes on May 9, Sreesanth bowled 6 balls, bookie made Rs 2.5 cr
- India and China ask border envoys to work on more steps
- Former Ranji player among 3 more held
- Rajasthan Royals to file FIR against tainted trio
- Family of theft accused allege police torture
- IVF breakthrough can triple number of births: Scientists
- After Khalid’s death, Muslim leaders want govt to make Nimesh panel report public
- Meteoroid impact triggers bright flash on the moon
- Cobrapost sting: NABARD chief gives clean chit to co-operative banks


'Top cop Pandey, now on run, plotted Ishrat encounter with IB man'
NIA nabs 2 Ajmer Sharif blast suspects in Vadodara
Youth shot, Amreli tense as groups clash
Deserted by husband just after marriage, Gujarat girl clears top UPSC exam



















