Manish Sabharwal

The second secession


Manish Sabharwal

CBI is at liberty to probe DA case against Mayawati: SC

Ads by Google

The Supreme Court today made it clear that the CBI has not been prohibited from probing the disproportionate assets (DA) case against BSP supremo Mayawati and issued notice to the Centre, CBI and former UP chief minister on a plea to review its verdict that quashed the DA case.

A bench of Justices P Sathasivam and Dipak Misra issued notice and made it clear that it would only clarify its July 6 verdict, quashing the DA case against Mayawati, on a review petition filed in the case.

"We issue notice to the Union of India, CBI and Mayawati only for this clarification," the bench said.

The court during the argument made it clear that the CBI "is at liberty to probe the DA case and they can approach the government for this."

"We never said that the CBI has no power to investigate. It can do so, but has to get sanction from the state government," the bench said.

The bench further said its verdict quashing the DA case was not to protect anyone.

The review petition has been filed by Uttar Pradesh native Kamlesh Verma who was an intervener in the case filed by Mayawati in the apex court for quashing the DA case against her.

Seeking review of the apex court's July 6 judgement, the petitioner has argued that the court had decided the case merely on technical grounds without appreciating the evidence collected by the CBI against Mayawati.

Ads by Google
Please read our terms of use before posting comments
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
comments powered by Disqus