Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

CCL transfer case: HC seeks explanation from Minister

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Three days after the Jharkhand High Court ordered issuance of a notice against Union Minister of State for Food Processing Subodh Kant Sahai seeking an explanation from him over the transfer of Central Coalfields Limited (CCL) officer Hitesh Verma to the Northern Coalfields Ltd, Sahai said, “I am going to submit the affidavit in the court soon.”

    Staying the CCL’s notification transferring Verma to NCL’s unit in Assam, Justice R K Merathia said, “His transfer has been stayed till further orders.” Hitesh allegedly killed his wife Sanjana for dowry. Sanjana’s parents alleged, “He often tortured her for dowry.” Sanjana reportedly died while being taken from CCL Hospital to Apollo Hospital on October 14, 2004. Subsequently, Sanjana’s father, P C Verma, lodged an FIR at the Argora Police Station alleging that Hitesh led to Sanjana’s death. In the FIR, he claimed, “While she was being taken to Apollo, Hitesh, who accompanied her in the ambulance, removed the oxygen pipe, which ultimately led to Sanjana’s death.”

    Ads by Google

    The police investigated the case and filed a chargesheet against Hitesh under Section 302 (murder) and 304-B (dowry).

    Later, Hitesh was arrested and remanded to judicial custody. He remained in jail from October 26, 2004 to December 11, 2005, when the Jharkhand High Court released him on bail. Around the same time, he was placed under suspension, which was revoked on December 29, 2005. On October 16, 2006 he was transferred from CCL to NCL.

    Meanwhile, Hitesh’s mother Saroj Bala filed a petition questioning the validity of the transfer order issued by the CCL on October 16, 2006.

    In her petition, she enclosed a report from the Union Ministry of Coal, which she obtained through the Right to Information (RTI) Act. The report indicated that Hitesh’s transfer was decided based on Sahai’s “recommendation”.

    Apparently, Sahai is related to the family and is Sanjana’s uncle. Petitioner counsel Rajiv Ranjan argued in the court, “This proves that Sahai had a personal grudge against him. He had implicated him in false cases of murder, dowry and kidnapping.”

    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.