Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Central survey records upward trend in sex ratio in Gujarat

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • After a constantly dwindling sex ratio over the years, Gujarat has now seen some improvement as per a survey report of the SRS (Sample Registration System), recently released by the Government of India.

    Gujarat is one of the few states with a skewed sex ratio and rampant female foeticide. In fact, the sex ratio had dipped from 954 in the 1991 census to 824 in 2004. However, the recent data, which pegs the present sex ratio at 891, indicates a marked increase in the figures over the last three years.

    “Gujarat also happens to be the only state that has seen such a marked improvement, and it has been acknowledged by the Government of India in its survey report,” said state Health Commissioner Dr Amarjeet Singh.

    The comparative data of the other states released recently reveals that Gujarat has shown a maximum improvement from 844 in 2005 to 891 in 2007.

    Ads by Google

    As per previous records, the sex ratio was in a precarious state and had reduced to 802 in 2002 from 954 in 1991. In 2002, the CRS (Central Registration System) data for Gujarat indicated an all time low of 802. It was then that the Health Department launched the Beti Bachao Andolan and tightened its grip over offenders of the Pre Conception and Pre natal Diagnostic Techniques (PNDT) Act. Later, an amendment to the Act also included the peripheral people not directly involved with sex determination but helping in the act.

    Implementing Officer of the PNDT Act, Dr M S Ranawat, said: “In 2004, the CRS survey had revealed that the sex ratio reached 824, and stated how the ratio dropped substantially all of a sudden. It also underlined the high probability of the ratio going below 800, which came as a real shock.”

    He added: “Then we came down heavily on the offenders, resulting in seizures and sealing of laboratories. The activity was accelerated at the mass level. Religious gurus were involved and even the media played a role. It was a joint effort, which is now showing an encouraging change.”

    Kil.s must be punishedBy: Rajat | 20-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward This means round 5-20% of people / families are invloved in kil.g of child in the womb. These are simply murder.rs and must be brought to justice.
    Factual erros or printing mistake!!By: Researcher | 04-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward It is surpising to see at more than one place that the news reporter/ editor use the name of one organisation as "CRS (Central Registration System) data for Gujarat", does not probably exist in India. On search over internet it shows one such name in London that is involved with measurement of electricity. So a data said to be provided by CRS on sex ratio raise some doubt by the report. Even the same has been used by an officer at one place of the report. Some clarification need to be given to readers in this regard.
    Sex Ratio at Birth Vs. Sex Ratio 0-4 years By: Mayur | 02-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward While Sex ratio at Birth is increasing, what is shocking is the fact that child sex ratio in urban Gujarat is not improving. It was 818 in 2002 and it has slightly declined to 813 in 2007. Is it the case that since PNDT is being enforced heavily, girl child is being neglected and allowed to die early??? This is clear from death statistics as well. Proportion of female death (0-1 years) to total female death in urban Gujarat has shot up heavily from 12.2% in 2002 to 19.7% 2007.Is Urban Gujarat turning from female foeticide to female infanticide??!!!
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.