Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Centre to increase number of judges in SC, HC: Antony

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Union Defence Minister A K Antony said the Centre is planning to increase the strength of judges in Supreme court and High courts and a legislation in this regard is in the offing.

    Supreme Court Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan had pointed out that there were three lakh pending cases before various courts and hence the Government had decided to increase the number of judges in various High courts and Supreme court, Antony said addressing a special session at the Indian Lawyers Congress Legal Enrichment camp here.

    However, increasing the strength of judges alone is not enough, he said, adding lawyers should also stop seeking frequent adjournments and the legal community should also ensure that benefits of law reaches the commonman.

    Stressing the need to preserve the rule of law, he said, all political parties and organisations should be committed to it.

    Ads by Google

    Earlier, Antony told reporters after inaugurating the Special Olympics here that the Centre would provide financial help to state governments to modernise their police department with modern electronic equipment.

    He said it would also provide modern equipment to military and para-military forces to fight terrorists.

    The Minister also presented awards to the winners of Special Olympics Kerala state meet.

    increasing judges in high / supreme courtsBy: S.M.Aurora | 24-Nov-2008 Reply | Forward The number of judges has no bearing on pendency of cases; it is the national character of our judiciary and committment of our advocates whose only motive is to fleece the citizens which matters.Unless our national management systems in courts including high courts and supreme courts honour competence of judges to speedily issue judgements
    Unions for AdvocatesBy: S Krishnan | 23-Nov-2008 Reply | Forward The government should also ban Advocates unions affiliation to any political party. When police cannot have union, how can we allow advocates. How can we expect an advocate who is in a union affiliated to Political party when turns into a Public Prosecutor to be unbiased. Currently in many states people have faith only in Judiciary, lets not rot that also.
    Adjournments to CasesBy: S Krishnan | 23-Nov-2008 Reply | Forward Yes, the adjournments should be restricted like a maximum of two per case for each party to that case. Then only we can atleast think of a verdict.
    lawBy: yohan | 23-Nov-2008 Reply | Forward appointing additional judges is a welcome move. however, the criminal and civil laws should be amended to stipulate certain durations by which a case must be settled once for all. for example, criminal cases should not go beyond a period of one year and civil litigations should be solved within 2-3 years. the number of adjournments to be taken by each side should also be restricted. not more than 3 adjournments should be allowed for each side. if more adjournments are sought heavy penalty should be imposed. also advocates, accused and even judges who fail to appear after fixing a date should be penalized for default. the accused or his representatives should not be allowed to meet or call any judges to influence them, which is becoming a curse in recent times. hope the whole law can be looked into more transparency. having said all this, we feel antony should not interfere in other's portfolio. the concerned minister should have told this announcement.
    Good NewsBy: Manish Joddar | 23-Nov-2008 Reply | Forward hope this had happened much before
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.