Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Centre’s Sethu argument contrary to its affidavit, says Swamy

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Accusing the Government of adopting a "dubious" stand on Rama Sethu, Janata Party president Subramaniam Swamy on Thursday submitted before the Supreme Court that the Centre's recent argument was contrary to the submissions made by it in the latest affidavit. The Centre, earlier, had withdrawn its controversial affidavits questioning the existence of Lord Rama and other characters of Ramayana.

    Swamy told an apex court bench headed by Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan the Centre admitted to the sacredness of Rama Sethu before the Madras High Court and had even contemplated that a viewing gallery along the Sethusamudram channel alignment would be built. "This admission demolishes the stand of the counsel (Centre's advocate), especially that Rama Sethu is not an integral part of Hindu religion," he said. The Centre and those concerned with the project have "no locus standi to pontificate on what is at the core of Hindu religion," he added.

    Ads by Google

    Swamy accused the Centre of burdening the court with "unsubstantiated" and "dubious" interpretations from the Puranas and the Ramayana to undermine the importance of the mythological bridge.

    Save Shri Ram SetuBy: Seema | 06-Nov-2008 Reply | Forward Shame on Indian Express for calling Shri Ram Setu a mythological bridge.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.