Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Century of forgetting

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Like all iconic texts the Arthashastra was fated to be known more than read, to be quoted more than understood. The latest Penguin translation thought it fit to unconscionably rearrange all the passages according to their topicality, as if the text was a random series of quotes to be mined. But the publication of the Shamashastry edition in 1909 had energised not just the history of political thought, but the study of history as well. In retrospect, the output occasioned by the text till the ’40s is staggering in its scope and intensity. There were of course dangers in appropriating the texts. As early as 1916, K.V. Ramaswami Aiyangar had warned in this connection that issues pertaining to history were “being obscured and findings vitiated by the tendency to treat history as an ally of dogma and to look into the armoury of our ancient polity for weapons to be used in the arena of modern political controversies.”

    But what, in retrospect, stands out about the intellectual milieu in which the text appeared in 1909 is this. First, the centrality of what we now broadly call the liberal arts, where a broad learned and for the most part liberal sensibility led to a new kind of interest in history and culture. Second, the gap between Sanskritists and a broader humanities culture was not as wide. We are now in a university system where even historians of ancient India struggle with Sanskrit, and Sanskritists cannot think beyond their ossified paradigms. There was an astonishing attempt in Indian universities to weave a rich set of traditional resources into a broad and deep debate without either being uncritical or apologetic; Sanskritists could in a certain sense perform the role of public intellectuals and ally that heritage to broad humanistic concerns. One can think randomly of Gopinath Kaviraj, Narendra Dev, Radhakamal Mukherjee, Hazari Prasad Dwivedi, Laxman Shastri Joshi or even Radhakrishnan. And certainly an astonishing burst of creativity in Hindi, Bengali and other literatures was as much a product of a cri-

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext1234
    Reductionism to ReconstructionismBy: Prabhakar Singh | 17-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward The article by Mehta is superb. The education system in India has indeed been a victim of what Mehta has pointed out. However, I find the remark on JNU by Shashank untenable. The elite education in India is no more about JNU but has shifted to IITs, IIMs and National law schools...in fact JNU has been now intrumental in breaking the parochial nationalistic and reductionist marxist consciouness. BS CHIMNI for example undone a lot of Marxist reduction by his personal reconstruction of international law from India. one would have thought that the Law schools should have done it and not someone from JNU..but the law schools are busy producing corporate lawyers and MBA aspirants..read singh, what can international law from India in 2:1 Journal of East Asia
    ReductionismBy: Naras | 16-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward Came to this thoughtful essay via Outlook blog. Look at the current education survey running there. Prime example of reductionism. This reaches a climax with their assessment of ROI on college degree investment! Apparently if you divide the average salary after placement by annual fees paid, you can compare the worth of the colleges!
    loss and recoveryBy: shashank | 16-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward How do we resuce humanites from JNU wallahs and Nikkar wallahs. You are too polite to name them, but that is the real source of the problem. we need people like you to creatively intepret our tradition for us.
    not to forget materialistsBy: Arvind S | 16-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward In your list if factors you forgot crass materialists - who have elevated the hard sciences of engineering, medicine and more recently business administration as being the only sort of knowledge worth pursuing. I disagree with the obscurantism of the Sankrit Pundits - sure they are sometimes obstacles in self-learning, but that is inherent in their role as keepers of a tradition that has been preserved through oral/rote learning. I am all for expanding the sphere and importance of the liberal arts, but here is an question which I hope you will answer – would liberal arts education be more valuable later in life? The charm of petty ideologies (Marxist or nationalist) no longer holds after a certain age. Not to mention that the pursuer will have lived more experiences and made contributions in the economic or scientific sphere, thus freeing the mind from the anxiety of making a living. Hence no hankering for jobs, tenure or fellowships
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.