You are here: IE »   Story

Chhattisgarh police is not prepared for guerrilla war with Maoists'

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Raman Singh
    Singh said political instability in the former has caused a heavy damage to the mineral-rich state.
    Discount UK Shopping

    Chhattisgarh police is not prepared to face the guerrilla war waged by Maoists, state Chief Minister Raman Singh on Saturday said and emphasized the need for two-pronged integrated action plan to tackle the menace in the country.

    To take on the ultras, the Chhattisgarh government has started a training college for the state police, Singh, who is here to campaign for BJP for the coming Jharkhand assembly polls, told a press conference here.

    "The integrated action plan should be formulated jointly by the Centre and the Maoist-hit states and besides combing operations, it should include all-round development including improvement of infrastructure in the areas badly hit by the menace", he said.

    The government should provide land to villagers, develop it for agriculture and provide facilities, he said adding a surrender policy should also be formed to bring the naxals back into the mainstream of the society.

    Ads by Google

    Stating that the problems being faced by Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh are similar, Singh said political instability in the former has caused a heavy damage to the mineral-rich state and blamed Congress and JMM for installing Madhu Koda, allegedly involved in a money laundering case, to the chief minister's post.

    lets first them do the job of better policingBy: Vinay Singh(Retd CRPF Comdt.) | 22-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Mr. raman has said what mr chidambaram has not been able to understand over the years. police is made for normal policing, a target which india has not been able to attain any time after independence. they are in actual reality not made for fighting terrorists/naxals. let them do their job better and without wasting any time further CRPF must be given higher say and lead role in fight against naxals.
    POLICEBy: NIRANJAN | 22-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward OF COURSE NOT! THEY ARE TOO BUSY COLLECTING HAFTAs AND PROTECTING THE POLITICIANS, NETAs AND THE BIGWIGS.
    here comes the importance of giving lead/main role to CRPFBy: Vinay Singh(Retd CRPF Comdt.) | 21-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Mr. raman has said what mr chidambaram has not been able to understand over the years. police is made for normal policing, a target which india has not been able to attain any time after independence. they are in actual reality not made for fighting terrorists/naxals. let them do their job better and without wasting any time further CRPF must be given higher say and lead role in fight against naxals.
    irresponsible state govts and polits must pay compensations.By: V.seshadri | 21-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward law and order is state-responsibility. states, which cannot provide security to central services like the railways, should be forced to pay for the rebuild of the rails destroyed, replacement of trains damaged and adequate compensation for the bereaved and hurt, bec of uncontrolled unlawful elements in their states. A good part of the compensations should come from the coffers of the political party in power.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.