Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Chidambaram’s remark on CRPF role in J-K is 'positive': Pak

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Shah Mahmood Qureshi
    This would help in building the right kind of environment for resuming the composite dialogue.

    Describing as a "positive development" Home Minister P Chidambaram's recent remarks that Indian government would like the paramilitary forces to play only a secondary role in Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan has said this would help build the right environment for resuming the composite dialogue.

    Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi yesterday welcomed Chidambaram's statement of June 11 and termed it as "a positive development," local daily 'Dawn' reported on Wednesday.

    Chidambaram had attended the Unified Headquarters meeting in Srinagar on June 11 during which a decision was taken to soon launch an exercise with the aim of seeing the J and K police don a primary role and gradually replace the CRPF.

    The Home Minister had said "we would like to take small, baby steps one by one and no great leap in Kashmir."

    Reacting to Chidambaram's remarks, Qureshi said that was what Pakistan had been calling on India to do all along. This would help in building the right kind of environment for resuming the composite dialogue stalled since the 26/11 Mumbai attacks and "it would also mean a great deal for the people of Kashmir," he said in London, where he stopped over on way back home after attending G-8 ministers' meet in Italy.

    Ads by Google

    During the Italy meet, Qureshi said he and his Afghan counterpart presented their respective points of view on the situation currently obtaining in "our area."

    "I also met the Indian Foreign Minister (S M Krishna) on the sidelines," he was quoted as saying by the daily.

    Chidambaram’s remark on CRPF role in J-K is a retrograde step in the wrong directionBy: Javed Khan | 07-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward The development of withdrawing the CRPF is most unfortunate. The Home Minister shouldreviewhis decision immediately. TheHome Minister is well advised to observe howthePaki Trecherous Heathen ISI has crushed the insurrection in POK and replicate the same here in India. Enough of mollycoddling the Pakis living in Kashmir. If they are not happy here , then they are most welcome to leave.Their trecehery must be crushed with heavy hand. Thsy bring a bad name to Muslims residing peacefully all over India.
    WelcomeBy: kumaresan | 02-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Our Home Minister taken a good and challengable decission to replace the kashmire police in control instead of CRPF. It is a good decission to give a democracy for the people, but we will watch carefull that pakistan will be play a role in the terriroist issue. So we will watch carefully by border security force in the border.
    Pak inteferenceBy: Dr. Ram Chander Sharma | 01-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Pakistan has no role in Kashmir, the approach of Indian Govt in restoration of peace in Jammu and Kashmir since 1947 is symbolic and is aimed at the appeasement of muslim vote bank two million POK refugees are languishing in camps for the last six decades. ISI is helping and financing the terror activities in Kashmir. Don't talk with Pakistan.
    Pakistan FM Qureshi's remarks about CRPF in JBy: thikal | 01-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Could the Indian media please tell Qureshi to shed his megalomania and, instead of talking about India's J
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.