Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

China’s (no big) deal

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Pranab Dhal Samanta

    India: Safeguards in perpetuity in accordance with the India-specific Safeguards Agreement between India and the IAEA (Article 10.2).

    Reality Check: China has agreed to allow American inspectors to visit its sites while the agreement with India is limited to only IAEA safeguards and inspections.

    Fuel Supply Assurances

    China: The quantity of material transferred under this Agreement shall be the quantity which the parties agree is necessary for any of the following purposes: the loading of reactors... the efficient and continuous operation of such reactors (Article 4.3).

    India: Development of a strategic reserve of nuclear fuel to guard against any disruption of supply over the lifetime of India’s reactors (Article 2.2 e). Support an Indian effort to develop a strategic reserve; if despite these arrangements, a disruption of fuel supplies to India occurs, jointly convene a group of friendly supplier countries to pursue such measures as would restore fuel supply to India (Article 5.6 b).

    Ads by Google

    Reality Check: The India 123 agreement clearly goes beyond the Hyde Act provision (Section 103-b) that fuel reserve should be “commensurate with reasonable reactor operating requirements”. As is evident this insertion in the Hyde Act was inspired by the China 123 agreement where the quantity must not exceed what is needed for “efficient and continuous operation”.

    Reprocessing

    China: Parties undertake the obligation to consider such activities favourably and agree to provide pertinent information on the plans during the consultations. Agree to refrain from actions which either party believes would pre-judge the long-term arrangements for undertaking such activities (Article 5.2). Obligation to consider favourably shall not prejudice the decision of the US to approve or disapprove such a request (Congressional Joint Resolution, Public Law 99-183, 16 December 1985).

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext1234
    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.