Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

CIC gives SC 10 days to disclose if judges have declared assets

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Personal Loan

    The Central Information Commission (CIC) has ruled that the Supreme Court and high courts are “public authorities” that come under the purview of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, and asked the apex court to disclose within 10 days if its judges have ever declared their assets.

    “The Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) of the Supreme Court is directed to provide information as to whether declaration of assets, etc., has been filed by the Honourable Judges of the Supreme Court or not within ten working days from the date of receipt of this decision notice,” a full bench of the CIC comprising Chief Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah and Information Commissioners M M Ansari and A N Tiwari said in a judgment late this evening.

    The judgment followed the refusal by the Supreme Court to entertain a query on the declaration of assets by judges. S C Agrawal had applied to the apex court for a copy of a Full Court Resolution passed on May 7, 1997, prescribing “every judge to make a declaration of assets in form of real estate or investments held in their names or in the name of their spouses and any person dependent on them to the Chief Justice”. He had also asked if judges had complied with the Resolution, and whether any high court judge had ever declared their assets to their respective Chief Justices. The Supreme Court had parted with a copy of the Resolution, but stonewalled the other queries.

    Ads by Google

    The CIC rejected the Supreme Court’s refusal, during the hearing of the case, to disclose information on the declaration of assets by judges on the ground that this information was filed by judges with the Chief Justice of India (CJI) in a “voluntary and confidential manner”, and held by the latter in his “personal capacity” owing to the “fiduciary relationship” among members of the Bench.

    ... contd.

    Next123
    disclose of assests By: chandragupthan.g.s | 18-Jan-2009 Reply | Forward Judges are bound to be honest and it is wonder what prevents from disclosing their assests. CJI should be aware that Lower Court Judicial officers are having benami bank accounts to have their corrupt money to be deposited and they withdraw them by ATM. Ofcourse CJI has stated in a interveiw that small mamools in the lowest grade is unavoidable. CJI must keep up the pride of the Apex Court and must remove the gallery of photo and restrain from acting an politician
    Judges are no AngelsBy: Rambabu | 07-Jan-2009 Reply | Forward Congrats CIC! Transparency
    RE: CIC and judge asset declarationBy: kkjingar | 07-Jan-2009 Reply | Forward Really good step in transparency.
    Judges Asset DeclarationBy: Uttrakhandi | 07-Jan-2009 Reply | Forward This is a historic judgement by the courageous members of the CIC which should be supported by all the people. Everyone, including our honourable judges, want to be a VIP with separate rules for them compared to the common citizen. We can not be called a civilized country so long we have such a long list of VIPs with different rules for them, despite equality enshrined in our constitution. The CJI was wrong when he first refused to apply the RTI rules to the judges and it will now require courage and magnanimity to accept the mistake and rectify it by agreeing to apply the rules to them equally. What moral authority SC can have in applying the provision of equality to other so called VIPs in any matter if it does not apply it to its own members? And it was shocking to read the hair-splitting done by the SC Registry in declaring that CJI office and SC were different entities- it is a pathetic argument. Lets all support the CIC line, if necessary by sending a memorandum to the SC.
    Good decisionBy: Munish Kaushik | 07-Jan-2009 Reply | Forward Very encouraging decision by CIC.....
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.