Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Circle of unreason

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • CPM boss Prakash Karat’s latest exposition on Indo-US relations has at least one merit. He makes it clear that Left opposition to the Indo-US nuclear deal is not about technical issues, but what he believes is a grand American design to “encircle” China by building a strategic partnership with India. Karat says the defence of international communism makes it CPM’s bounden duty to block any Indo-US cooperation now, or in the future. The acutely realist Chinese Communist Party, however, is quite adept at dealing with American power, with or without CPM’s solicitous solidarity.

    Unlike the CPM, which has never gone beyond a verbal war against imperialism, the CCP fought a real war, with thousands of casualties, against the US in Korea in the early fifties. Twenty years later, Mao’s China was in alliance with Washington against Russian communist brothers. During the last six decades, Beijing has been closer to Washington on a more sustained basis than New Delhi has ever been. China’s annual trade surplus with the US today is larger than India’s total exports to the world. Karat’s proposition that India is about to substitute for Pakistan as America’s most valued ally is even more ridiculous. One wonders how New Delhi can replace Islamabad in the US war against Al-Qaida and the Taliban on the frontier between Pakistan and Afghanistan. It is beyond Karat’s simplistic schema to explain why Pakistan has enjoyed such good relations with both Washington and Beijing, even in the worst period of Sino-US confrontation during the fifties and sixties.

    Ads by Google

    ... contd.

    Next12

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.