You are here: IE »   Story

Citing his daughter, SC judge exits Ambani case

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Lead
    Discount UK Shopping

    In a development that may prolong hearing in the legal battle between the Ambani brothers over supply of gas, Justice R V Raveendran of the Supreme Court, who was part of the three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan hearing the matter, today recused himself from the case, saying his daughter worked for a law firm that had been advising Mukesh Ambani’s Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL) in some other matter.

    The case involving RIL and Anil Ambani’s Reliance Natural Resources Ltd (RNRL) over the pricing of gas from the Krishna Godavari basin was adjourned until Thursday when a new bench will be constituted for the hearing.

    It is learnt that Justice B Sudershan Reddy will be the third judge on the bench.

    Legal experts said there was “very little” chance of concluding hearing in the matter by November 17 as was sought earlier by the bench. “The new judge would like to hear the matter afresh to get acquainted with facts of the case as well as contentions raised by the RIL counsel who has been addressing the court so far,” said one of the lawyers in the case.

    Ads by Google

    Justice Raveendran, who had earlier too offered to dissociate himself from the bench as he had shares in companies owned by both brothers but was persuaded to stay on, withdrew from the bench just as hearing began today.

    “I am recusing myself from hearing this matter since I came to know only yesterday that my daughter is associated with a solicitors’ firm which is advising the Mukesh Ambani group in other matters relating to projects of global acquisitions,” Justice Raveendran said.

    ... contd.

    Next123
    Why succumb to pressureBy: Ketki Pathak | 05-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward The news say that the Honorable was asked to stay on the bench even though he insisted on disassociating himself as he held shares from both the companies. Why succumb to such pleas and pressures, even if it was form the Chief Justice? India needs dedicated and devoted lawyers and Justice's. They set an example and hence it should be seen as a matter of ethics and professional obligation to check with any conflict of interest in the first place.
    People should appreciate the act of Hon'ble Judge.By: Abdulmajeed Khan Advocate | 05-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Dear Sir, When the Hon'ble Judge of Supreme court recused from the case,his lordship had been in the situation at that time,which can not be expressed in words, so has taken the right decision at right time to withdraw from the case.Some stages Hon'ble Judges have no knowledge of future events, some thing may have forced his concious, which compelled his lorddship to recuse from the matter.In the context of my 32 years standing practice and observation. His lordship has recused from the case, which speaks itself, his lordship is most honest,trustworthy Hon'ble Judge of the Apex court. I pray God for his ever success and we all should follow his principles.
    Bad Taste to Judiciary?By: Madan Menon Thottasseri | 05-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward If a Judge had his own unique reasons to disassociate from the hearing a case, he should have opted out of the bench much earlier, not on the hearing day causing predicaments in all respects. The judge must have imagined that he sets an example, but went in bad taste as the incident will prolong the case and over-run cost to court and litigants. The nation needs Judges not only for good judgments but also for manifesting judicious precedents.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.